Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org writes:
* Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de, 2010-09-11, 19:46:
Because you are a reportbug novice. Novices are not allowed to play
with severity of bugs. :)
I consider this a horrible misfeature of reportbug. Yes, we need RC
bugs from novices, too.
--
* Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de, 2010-09-11, 19:46:
Because you are a reportbug novice. Novices are not allowed to play
with severity of bugs. :)
I consider this a horrible misfeature of reportbug. Yes, we need RC bugs
from novices, too.
--
Jakub Wilk
signature.asc
Description:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 07:46:34PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
but reportbug did not let me specify either of RC / critical
/ grave / serious / security ...
Because you are a reportbug novice.
Or at least reportbug thinks so =:-
But thanks anyway ;-)
Karsten
--
GPG key ID
Karsten Hilbert karsten.hilb...@gmx.net writes:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 12:38:05PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Here comes the bug: GNUmed will, given appropriate
circumstances, OVERWRITE the first allergy against Sugar.
...
You die in hospital because of a second
Hi,
Le 09/09/10 21:40, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 04:11:50PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
And please, make all possible effort to warn your users about the
potential risk of using or having used the buggy version. And even if
it's only I'm not sure, but it may well be
Hi,
with GNUmed we currently have a case where a bug is not RC regarding the
computer system and would not match our criterion of RC bugs. However,
the influence of this bug might harm the health of patients of the
doctor who might use this version of GNUmed.
If needed upstream will give some
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:40:49 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
with GNUmed we currently have a case where a bug is not RC regarding the
computer system and would not match our criterion of RC bugs. However,
the influence of this bug might harm the health of patients of the
doctor who might use
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 11:40:49AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
with GNUmed we currently have a case where a bug is not RC regarding the
computer system and would not match our criterion of RC bugs. However,
the influence of this bug might harm the health of patients of the
doctor who might
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:58, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:40:49 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
with GNUmed we currently have a case where a bug is not RC regarding the
computer system and would not match our criterion of RC bugs. However,
the influence of
[...]
Here comes the bug: GNUmed will, given appropriate
circumstances, OVERWRITE the first allergy against Sugar.
Three years later, Debian 10 has been released and you
return because of FatigueFromPackaging.
I prescribe Sugar, which usually helps against
On Thu Sep 09 12:03, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
Here comes the bug: GNUmed will, given appropriate
circumstances, OVERWRITE the first allergy against Sugar.
Sounds like grave: , or causes data loss, ... to me, which is RC.
I was also going to suggest it could be considered a
On 09.09.2010 11:58, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:40:49 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
with GNUmed we currently have a case where a bug is not RC regarding the
computer system and would not match our criterion of RC bugs. However,
the influence of this bug might harm the health
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 12:38:05PM +0200, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Here comes the bug: GNUmed will, given appropriate
circumstances, OVERWRITE the first allergy against Sugar.
...
You die in hospital because of a second anaphylactic
reaction to Sugar.
[...]
Although I do
* Karsten Hilbert [2010-09-09 13:07 +0200]:
Filed a bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596219
but reportbug did not let me specify either of RC / critical
/ grave / serious / security ...
I just set this to serious. It may take some minutes until the BTS is
updated
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes:
with GNUmed we currently have a case where a bug is not RC regarding
the computer system and would not match our criterion of RC bugs.
Rather than RC (which is only about whether the severity of the bug is
sufficient to delay the release of Debian), what
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 14:34, Ben Finney ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu writes:
with GNUmed we currently have a case where a bug is not RC regarding
the computer system and would not match our criterion of RC bugs.
Rather than RC (which is only about whether
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:34:09PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
From your description, I'd guess one of ???causes serious data loss??? (???
???critical???)
Strictly speaking I do not really regard the problem in #596219 as a
data loss - the available data are just not properly handled which can
On Thu Sep 09 14:42, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Rather than RC (which is only about whether the severity of the bug is
sufficient to delay the release of Debian), what is the severity of the
bug?
AFAIK, this is not the sort of package that would delay Debian's
release. At worst it would
serious -- in the package maintainer's or release manager's opinion, makes the
package unsuitable for release.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Hi guys,
This thread is just surrealistic.
Le 09/09/10 15:17, Andreas Tille a écrit :
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:34:09PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
From your description, I'd guess one of ???causes serious data loss??? (???
???critical???)
Strictly speaking I do not really regard the
On 09/09/2010 16:11, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
You have a bug that could potentially kill people? Fix it, upload ASAP
and contact the security and release teams. And I don't care if it's
not the normal procedure and if it can piss off people, it's not
nearly as important as Doing What You
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 04:43:53PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Right. I was wondering why Andreas didn't contact the Release Team to have
our opinion on the subject. IMO, it qualifies as an RC bug and the
diff (0.7.8 ??? 0.7.9) doesn't look huge. It's even reasonable and acceptable,
once
On 09/09/2010 08:38 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 04:43:53PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Right. I was wondering why Andreas didn't contact the Release Team
to have our opinion on the subject. IMO, it qualifies as an RC bug
and the diff (0.7.8 ??? 0.7.9) doesn't look huge.
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 04:11:50PM +0200, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
And please, make all possible effort to warn your users about the
potential risk of using or having used the buggy version. And even if
it's only I'm not sure, but it may well be serious enough to KILL
PEOPLE, bloody hell, why
24 matches
Mail list logo
