severity 399214 important
thanks
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:24:01PM +0100, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote:
Is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=399214 release
critical?
The version of solfege in etch fails to upgrade from a version that does
_not exist_ in neither stable, testing or
Is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=399214 release
critical?
The version of solfege in etch fails to upgrade from a version that does
_not exist_ in neither stable, testing or sid now. It was a version that
earlier was in testing, but has been replaced by a more recent version.
--
I think such bugs can be easily closed.
Regards
Daniel
Tom Cato Amundsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=399214 release
critical?
The version of solfege in etch fails to upgrade from a version that does
_not exist_ in neither stable, testing or
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 12:55:47PM +0100, Daniel J. Priem wrote:
I think such bugs can be easily closed.
I disagree. If it was previously in testing, it could conceivably have
been removed without the user noticing. In which case, it would be
acceptable for the user to expect that the upgrade
Daniel J. Priem wrote:
I think such bugs can be easily closed.
The bug is closed with the last upload to sid, the question is whether
it should be considered as RC and if the release team will approve the
fix for Etch.
When upgrading from Sarge to Etch there is no issue, but for users
like me
5 matches
Mail list logo
