Quoting Thomas Goirand (2022-02-26 00:08:47)
> On 2/25/22 11:38, Philip Hands wrote:
> > Having looked at how it was done, I applaud Andreas for doing a
> > proper job.
>
> +1
>
> Anyone complaining about this kind of contribution to Debian is a
> moron and a barrier to progress. We really
On 2/25/22 11:38, Philip Hands wrote:
Having looked at how it was done, I applaud Andreas for doing a proper job.
+1
Anyone complaining about this kind of contribution to Debian is a moron
and a barrier to progress. We really need to get rid of this toxic
mentality in Debian.
Jonas, I
Hi Paul,
Am Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 08:49:00PM +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers:
> On 25-02-2022 15:02, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > My point was rather that the suggested salvage procedure might not raise
> > any signal and I'm pretty sure that I would have lost track on this.
>
> Everybody is now free to
Hi all,
Thanks Andreas, for taking care.
On 25-02-2022 15:02, Andreas Tille wrote:
My point was rather that the suggested salvage procedure might not raise
any signal and I'm pretty sure that I would have lost track on this.
Everybody is now free to help and fix the autopkgtest regression
Am Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 12:09:26PM +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
>
> Please note that "has no RC bugs" is *NOT* the threshold for NMUs, and
> certainly not if your approach to doing the NMU involved package
> refactoring: When you do an NMU, it is your responsibility to ensure
> that your
Quoting Philip Hands (2022-02-25 11:38:25)
> Jonas Smedegaard writes:
>
> ...
> > Yes, which means you can fast-track for *THAT* reason - unrelated to
> > code smell, which is specifically what I was talking about.
>
> I understand that you were reacting to the idea that one can just
> stomp
Quoting Andreas Tille (2022-02-25 10:43:42)
> Am Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:35:43AM +0100 schrieb Johannes Schauer
> Marin Rodrigues:
> > Is this not something that can be solved by salvaging [1] the
> > package in question?
>
> My question is targeting in this direction since salvaging is what we
Quoting Philip Hands (2022-02-25 10:09:29)
> Andreas Tille writes:
>
> > Am Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:58:12PM +0900 schrieb Osamu Aoki:
> >> > This is probably very academic now since Andreas Tille has
> >> > uploaded a fixed xdelta3 package today.
> >>
> >> Now that I know that the new xdelta3
Jonas Smedegaard writes:
...
> Yes, which means you can fast-track for *THAT* reason - unrelated to
> code smell, which is specifically what I was talking about.
I understand that you were reacting to the idea that one can just stomp
on the existing packaging simply because it "smells bad",
Quoting Bastian Blank (2022-02-25 10:04:46)
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 09:50:18AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I would certainly be frustrated if someone fast-tracked an NMU with
> > structural changes like switching to short-form dh, with the
> > reasoning that "the packaged had a smell to
Am Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 09:50:18AM +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> > Given the fact that there was a nearly 4 year old patch (#895957) made
> > me feel that I'm not alone with this but on the other hand the creator
> > of the patch (thanks Jeremy for doing at least half of the necessary
> >
Hi Philip,
Am Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:09:29AM +0100 schrieb Philip Hands:
>
> FWIW I also started work on xdelta3 when I saw the removal warning for
> installation-guide, but when I got to the point of creating a repo on
> salsa you'd beaten me to it by about an hour :-)
Nice. ;-)
May be I
Am Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:35:43AM +0100 schrieb Johannes Schauer Marin
Rodrigues:
> Is this not something that can be solved by salvaging [1] the package in
> question?
My question is targeting in this direction since salvaging is what we
somehow agreed upon.
> Do a tiny NMU fixing an RC bug
Quoting Andreas Tille (2022-02-25 09:22:38)
> I had to decide between a "proper NMU" and an "upload that fits the packaging
> standards I apply to what I upload" (which includes maintained on Salsa,
> usage of dh, DEP5 copyright ... basically removing the smell from the
> package). I decided for
Hi
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 09:50:18AM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I would certainly be frustrated if someone fast-tracked an NMU with
> structural changes like switching to short-form dh, with the reasoning
> that "the packaged had a smell to it", for a package that I maintain.
Well, do
Andreas Tille writes:
> Am Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:58:12PM +0900 schrieb Osamu Aoki:
>> > This is probably very academic now since Andreas Tille has uploaded a
>> > fixed
>> > xdelta3 package today.
>>
>> Now that I know that the new xdelta3 is uploaded, I am OK.
>
> BTW, I stumbled upon
Quoting Andreas Tille (2022-02-25 09:22:38)
> Am Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:58:12PM +0900 schrieb Osamu Aoki:
> > > This is probably very academic now since Andreas Tille has
> > > uploaded a fixed xdelta3 package today.
> >
> > Now that I know that the new xdelta3 is uploaded, I am OK.
>
> BTW,
Am Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 11:58:12PM +0900 schrieb Osamu Aoki:
> > This is probably very academic now since Andreas Tille has uploaded a fixed
> > xdelta3 package today.
>
> Now that I know that the new xdelta3 is uploaded, I am OK.
BTW, I stumbled upon xdelta3 since also a package of mine
18 matches
Mail list logo
