Quoting Henrique de Moraes Holschuh :
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, john.k...@vfemail.net wrote:
Is the reason for closing the bug 837459 appropriate here? The bug is
still
here and no backported version.
I believe it was appropriately closed, yes.
#837459 is not a request for a backport. Instead
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> for that backport, and refering to bug #836459...
Typo. Make that bug #837459...
--
Henrique Holschuh
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, john.k...@vfemail.net wrote:
> Is the reason for closing the bug 837459 appropriate here? The bug is still
> here and no backported version.
I believe it was appropriately closed, yes.
#837459 is not a request for a backport. Instead, it is a bug about
something th
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, john.k...@vfemail.net wrote:
> Is the reason for closing the bug 837459 appropriate here? The bug is still
> here and no backported version.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837459
This bug is fixed in unstable and testing, but is current
Hello,
Is the reason for closing the bug 837459 appropriate here? The bug is still
here and no backported version.
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837459
Best wishes,
John
-
ONLY AT VFEmail! - Use our Metadata Mitigator to
5 matches
Mail list logo