On 2023-08-16 13:22, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I personally think the extent to which git has "won", both upstream and in
> Debian package maintenance, means that the Patch Tagging Guidelines should
> be encouraging the git-like style as primary
I think this is an excellent argument. DEP-3 hails
Hi,
On Tue, 08 Aug 2023, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Lately I've been updating metadata in patches in packages I maintain and
> noticed several issues with the Patch Tagging Guidelines, and after Lucas
> created the new great patches UDD service [P] and we discussed some
>
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 12:22:33PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I personally think the extent to which git has "won", both upstream and in
> Debian package maintenance, means that the Patch Tagging Guidelines should
> be encouraging the git-like style as primary, with From/Date/Subject
> in a
On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 12:25:13 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Here's what a git format-patch patch looks like:
>
> ,---
> From 9767e87d08803d78208464be3652a9231b6b08e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Guillem Jover
> Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:31:02 +0200
One particularly popular tool for
maintain and
> > noticed several issues with the Patch Tagging Guidelines, and after Lucas
> > created the new great patches UDD service [P] and we discussed some
> > other issues there, it looked like the guidelines could do with some
> > fixes and updates.
> >
> &
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 03:42:03PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 08/08/23 at 01:25 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
- There is a requirement for the first field to appear on the first
line, but git formatted patches start with «From ».
That's OK, since From is an alternative to Author, so
Hi,
On 08/08/23 at 01:25 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Lately I've been updating metadata in patches in packages I maintain and
> noticed several issues with the Patch Tagging Guidelines, and after Lucas
> created the new great patches UDD service [P] and we discussed some
Hi!
Lately I've been updating metadata in patches in packages I maintain and
noticed several issues with the Patch Tagging Guidelines, and after Lucas
created the new great patches UDD service [P] and we discussed some
other issues there, it looked like the guidelines could do with some
fixes
8 matches
Mail list logo