On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> But in principle it does sound like a good idea to feed this information
> into UDD. What do you think about keeping content of binary and source
> packages inside UDD?
Sounds very good to me.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 08:45:34AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 06:13:45PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > > I *think*, if Raphael hadn't stepped up first and saved you the bother,
> > > you could probably get this information out of UDD.
> >
> > AFAIK (and supported by
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 06:13:45PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> > I *think*, if Raphael hadn't stepped up first and saved you the bother,
> > you could probably get this information out of UDD.
>
> AFAIK (and supported by [1]) UDD doesn't even have the Contents of binary
> packages.
But in p
3 matches
Mail list logo