Re: LJPEG 62.1 release ! (was Re: [med-svn] r2712 - trunk/packages/gdcm/trunk/debian (jpeg))

2008-11-26 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Andreas, On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Let see if the community has any interest in this package. There are a couple of gray areas remaining: - should I keep the version number 62 (aka 6b) from IJG or

LJPEG 62.1 release ! (was Re: [med-svn] r2712 - trunk/packages/gdcm/trunk/debian (jpeg))

2008-11-25 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Well the size of the lib will change. I think the API is compatible, but I do not know about the ABI. I really do not feel comfortable with option 1. OK - I just trust you

Re: LJPEG 62.1 release ! (was Re: [med-svn] r2712 - trunk/packages/gdcm/trunk/debian (jpeg))

2008-11-25 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Mathieu Malaterre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Well the size of the lib will change. I think the API is compatible, but I do not know about the

Re: LJPEG 62.1 release ! (was Re: [med-svn] r2712 - trunk/packages/gdcm/trunk/debian (jpeg))

2008-11-25 Thread Andreas Tille
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: Let see if the community has any interest in this package. There are a couple of gray areas remaining: - should I keep the version number 62 (aka 6b) from IJG or will this confuse people ? The version number should be different from the other