Andreas,
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
>>> Let see if the community has any interest in this package. There are a
>>> couple of gray areas remaining:
>>>
>>> - should I keep the version number 62 (aka 6b
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Let see if the community has any interest in this package. There are a
couple of gray areas remaining:
- should I keep the version number 62 (aka 6b) from IJG or will this
confuse people ?
The version number should be different from the other libj
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Mathieu Malaterre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>>
>>> Well the size of the lib will change. I think the API is compatible,
>>> but I do not kn
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>
>> Well the size of the lib will change. I think the API is compatible,
>> but I do not know about the ABI. I really do not feel comfortable with
>> option 1.
>
> OK - I just
4 matches
Mail list logo
