On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 06:07:43PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > Rank "Further discussion" first. That's our best way to say "I think
> > this vote is wrong".
> But that will delay even further Lenny release; I think that a simple
> vote like the one dato proposed is what is needed to let us move
>
* Sandro Tosi [081218 20:51]:
> ehm? what? how is it un-democratic to have different votes for
> different things, targetted exactly to decide where something is
> allowed or not?
Then do different votes for different things. And put together what
belongs together.
But just having a "wait foreve
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 20:33, Bernhard R. Link wrote:
> * Sandro Tosi [081218 18:11]:
>> But that will delay even further Lenny release;
>
> Hey! You suggested to redo something. Thus you are suggesting to delay.
But maybe with the aim of a better target?
>> I think that a simple
>> vote like
* Sandro Tosi [081218 18:11]:
> But that will delay even further Lenny release;
Hey! You suggested to redo something. Thus you are suggesting to delay.
> I think that a simple
> vote like the one dato proposed is what is needed to let us move
> forward a release.
Please note that changing the v
Hi Gunnar,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 17:38, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Sandro Tosi dijo [Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 01:22:40PM +0100]:
>> Hello,
>> I've started a new thread because follow 2 very long thread starts
>> being a little tedious.
>>
>> This voice is coming out more and more strong lately: why don't
Sandro Tosi dijo [Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 01:22:40PM +0100]:
> Hello,
> I've started a new thread because follow 2 very long thread starts
> being a little tedious.
>
> This voice is coming out more and more strong lately: why don't we
> simply delete the current gr_lenny and start another ballot, on
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 02:59:52PM +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Do we have any well-defined procedure to stop/cancel a GR (in progress)? If
> not,
> is it the DPL to decide, based on what is voiced on this list? Shouldn't
> people
> just say "Further discussion" in their votes to express s
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 01:22:40PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>
> > So, how many are in favor of redo *completely* the vote (in more
> > ballot, the first being the one for lenny ONLY)? how many should we be
> > to let it happen? how many should be in contrary to stop this re-vote?
> > how can we
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 01:22:40PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> So, how many are in favor of redo *completely* the vote (in more
> ballot, the first being the one for lenny ONLY)? how many should we be
> to let it happen? how many should be in contrary to stop this re-vote?
> how can we express the
Hello,
I've started a new thread because follow 2 very long thread starts
being a little tedious.
This voice is coming out more and more strong lately: why don't we
simply delete the current gr_lenny and start another ballot, only
focusing on the *real* lenny release? All other options must go int
10 matches
Mail list logo
