Re: Licenses for DebConf6 [was: Re: DebConf6: Call For Papers]

2005-11-13 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 12:28:07AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:01:48 +0100 Andreas Schuldei wrote: > > > Fine Print Publication Rights > > > > Debconf requires non-exclusive publication rights to papers, > > presentations, and any additional handouts or audio/visual m

Re: Licenses for DebConf6 [was: Re: DebConf6: Call For Papers]

2005-11-12 Thread Andreas Schuldei
sorry for replying to this only today. i had been busy preparing for a talk i was giving yesterday at a conf. * Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-10 01:08:49]: > > given your knowledge level of how debconf intents to handle > > things and the way you escalate this issue gives me the ide

Re: Licenses for DebConf6 [was: Re: DebConf6: Call For Papers]

2005-11-09 Thread Francesco Poli
[replying to a message that was directed to debian-devel only, but readding debian-legal in Cc:] On Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:38:07 +0100 Andreas Schuldei wrote: > * Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-08 00:28:07]: > > "The authors have the freedom to pick a DFSG-free license" means > > that th

Re: Licenses for DebConf6 [was: Re: DebConf6: Call For Papers]

2005-11-08 Thread Andreas Schuldei
* Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-08 00:28:07]: > "The authors have the freedom to pick a DFSG-free license" means that > they *may* do so, but are not required to. Am I correct? > > IMHO, DebConf paper authors should be *required* to publish in a > DFSG-free manner, as a condition for

Re: OT: Humor: Re: Licenses for DebConf6 [was: Re: DebConf6: Call For Papers]

2005-11-07 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Tuesday 08 November 2005 01:58 am, Adam Heath wrote: > On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Brian M. Carlson wrote: > > The way I read it was that "the authors may pick any license, so long as > > it's DFSG-free". Do you see how it could be read that way? > > You sound just like Henry Ford. My goal was to do e

OT: Humor: Re: Licenses for DebConf6 [was: Re: DebConf6: Call For Papers]

2005-11-07 Thread Adam Heath
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, Brian M. Carlson wrote: > The way I read it was that "the authors may pick any license, so long as it's > DFSG-free". Do you see how it could be read that way? You sound just like Henry Ford. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Re: Licenses for DebConf6 [was: Re: DebConf6: Call For Papers]

2005-11-07 Thread Brian M. Carlson
On Monday 07 November 2005 11:28 pm, Francesco Poli wrote: > [Added Cc: debian-legal, because the topic may be of interest there, > I would say.] > [No need to Cc: me, as long as you keep Cc:ing debian-legal (just to > make things clear: I am subscribed to debian-legal, but not to > debian-devel)]

Licenses for DebConf6 [was: Re: DebConf6: Call For Papers]

2005-11-07 Thread Francesco Poli
[Added Cc: debian-legal, because the topic may be of interest there, I would say.] [No need to Cc: me, as long as you keep Cc:ing debian-legal (just to make things clear: I am subscribed to debian-legal, but not to debian-devel)] On Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:01:48 +0100 Andreas Schuldei wrote: > F