Hi,
On 23/09/2014 16:52, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Montag, 4. August 2014, Clement Hermann wrote:
I saw that on my Sid system, some packages have the same issue :
rgrep -rl 'by-sa/2\.0' /usr/share/icons/*/scalable |xargs dlocate
--package-only
gitg
network-manager-gnome
soundconverter
Hi Clement,
On Samstag, 27. September 2014, Clement Hermann wrote:
If there is no reply to this issue yet again (in say two weeks) I'd
recommend filing bugs about this. RC bugs. This also follows nicely the
tradition of making the freeze longer by filing bugs late ;-/
I did, only with
Hi,
On Montag, 4. August 2014, Clement Hermann wrote:
while preparing my packaging of Tails' OpenPGP Applet (ITP #756404), it
was pointed to me that there were issues on images files shipped with it
: they where licensed using CC-BY-SA 2.0, which is not DFSG-compliant.
I might be wrong, but
On 23/09/2014 16:52, Holger Levsen wrote:
They seemed indeed derived from icons using an old tango theme, which
were indeed licensed CC-BY-SA 2.0 at the time.
that was the non upgradable licence, right?
As I understand it, you can license derivative work with any later
version of the
Hi,
while preparing my packaging of Tails' OpenPGP Applet (ITP #756404), it
was pointed to me that there were issues on images files shipped with it
: they where licensed using CC-BY-SA 2.0, which is not DFSG-compliant.
They seemed indeed derived from icons using an old tango theme, which
were
Le Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 11:39:08AM +0200, Clement Hermann a écrit :
I saw that on my Sid system, some packages have the same issue :
rgrep -rl 'by-sa/2\.0' /usr/share/icons/*/scalable |xargs dlocate
--package-only
gitg
network-manager-gnome
soundconverter
thunar-volman
xfburn
On Aug 05, Charles Plessy ple...@debian.org wrote:
At this point, why not deciding that after all CC-BY-SA 2.0 is accaptable for
Debian. Sorry for repeating myself, but there is not first-hand explanation
of
what is wrong with this license. I think that pointers to personal pages or
This
7 matches
Mail list logo
