Hi,
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> I am going to file a few dozens of bugs against packages that are embedding
> copies of Python modules; more specifically:
> - modules available as separate Debian packages: argparse, beautifulsoup,
> clientform, coherence, configobj, elementtree, feedparser, mechanize,
> p
]] anatoly techtonik
| Do you mean that all these packages need to stick to the stable
| standard version of some Module available in Debian? I personally
| think that fit is a bad idea, because by upgrading such Module it is
| possible to break Python Application that require older version of th
anatoly techtonik writes:
> 2009/11/8 Jakub Wilk :
>> I am going to file a few dozens of bugs against packages that are
>> embedding copies of Python modules; more specifically:
> Do you mean that all these packages need to stick to the stable
> standard version of some Module available in Debia
2009/11/8 Jakub Wilk :
> I am going to file a few dozens of bugs against packages that are embedding
> copies of Python modules; more specifically:
Do you mean that all these packages need to stick to the stable
standard version of some Module available in Debian? I personally
think that fit is a
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 05:43:20PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
>
> Jonathan Wiltshire
> rednotebook
Because rednotebook embeds a copy of txt2tags presumably? This is because
it uses some features in txt2tags's VCS that aren't yet released, and I'm
already working closely with upstream to remove
I am going to file a few dozens of bugs against packages that are embedding
copies of Python modules; more specifically:
- modules available as separate Debian packages: argparse, beautifulsoup,
clientform, coherence, configobj, elementtree, feedparser, mechanize, pexpect,
ply, pyparsing, simpleta
6 matches
Mail list logo
