Le 13 mai 2014 17:42, "Russ Allbery" a écrit :
>
> > Le 13 mai 2014 03:01, "Michael Biebl" a =C3=A9crit :
> >> Am 13.05.2014 02:54, schrieb Russ Allbery:
>
> >>> Yeah, that's just what I was thinking. Any software that doesn't
> >>> honor an invoke-rc.d policy is RC-buggy anyway, and it would be
> Le 13 mai 2014 03:01, "Michael Biebl" a =C3=A9crit :
>> Am 13.05.2014 02:54, schrieb Russ Allbery:
>>> Yeah, that's just what I was thinking. Any software that doesn't
>>> honor an invoke-rc.d policy is RC-buggy anyway, and it would be good
>>> to catch and fix that.
> Could you also open a b
On 13 May 2014 16:15, Cameron Norman wrote:
> It looks like it already does this. I assume the user running the command
> manually would not hurt anything, correct?
>
I think the user running the command manually would have the same problems.
Especially as it is a daemon.
Is this is something D
El Mon, 12 de May 2014 a las 10:53 PM, Brian May
escribió:
On 13 May 2014 15:44, Cameron Norman wrote:
I found another use of su that may need to be added to your list.
rabbitmq (oddly) wraps itself up in a shell script,
/usr/sbin/rabbitmq-server, which asserts the user is root or
rabbitmq,
Le 13 mai 2014 03:01, "Michael Biebl" a écrit :
>
> Am 13.05.2014 02:54, schrieb Russ Allbery:
> > Steve Langasek writes:
> >
> >> AFAIK, d-i disabling of s-s-d is a historical workaround for packages
> >> not using invoke-rc.d (back in the days before it was a Policy "must").
> >> Maybe it's tim
On 13 May 2014 15:44, Cameron Norman wrote:
> I found another use of su that may need to be added to your list. rabbitmq
> (oddly) wraps itself up in a shell script, /usr/sbin/rabbitmq-server, which
> asserts the user is root or rabbitmq, and drops down to rabbitmq if it is
> root (using su), the
El Mon, 12 de May 2014 a las 6:01 PM, Michael Biebl
escribió:
Am 13.05.2014 02:54, schrieb Russ Allbery:
Steve Langasek writes:
AFAIK, d-i disabling of s-s-d is a historical workaround for
packages
not using invoke-rc.d (back in the days before it was a Policy
"must").
Maybe it's time
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 03:01:10AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 13.05.2014 02:54, schrieb Russ Allbery:
> > Steve Langasek writes:
> >> AFAIK, d-i disabling of s-s-d is a historical workaround for packages
> >> not using invoke-rc.d (back in the days before it was a Policy "must").
> >> Maybe
Am 13.05.2014 02:54, schrieb Russ Allbery:
> Steve Langasek writes:
>
>> AFAIK, d-i disabling of s-s-d is a historical workaround for packages
>> not using invoke-rc.d (back in the days before it was a Policy "must").
>> Maybe it's time to drop this diversion of s-s-d?
>
> Yeah, that's just what
9 matches
Mail list logo