Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use

2013-10-29 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
]] Aron Xu > > IPMI would be lovely, but I'm not sure we can locate a board right now with > > that - so, we may have to fix remote management with a remotely controlled > > power/reset box - I believe they exist (something else I've been looking > > into). If the DSA already use some then I'd be

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use

2013-10-29 Thread David Kuehling
Hi, > "Graham" == Graham Whaley writes: > What we need to consider here is also board price and availability. We > can buy 2f mini-PCs, relatively cheap and easily. If they satisfy a > need then they may be (a mid-term/interim) solution to shortage of > hardware right now. If I find we can s

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use

2013-10-29 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Aron Xu > >> > IPMI would be lovely, but I'm not sure we can locate a board right now with >> > that - so, we may have to fix remote management with a remotely controlled >> > power/reset box - I believe they exist (something else I've b

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use

2013-10-29 Thread Aron Xu
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Aron Xu > >> > IPMI would be lovely, but I'm not sure we can locate a board right now with >> > that - so, we may have to fix remote management with a remotely controlled >> > power/reset box - I believe they exist (something else I've b

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use

2013-10-29 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Aron Xu wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: >> ]] Aron Xu >> >>> > IPMI would be lovely, but I'm not sure we can locate a board right now >>> > with >>> > that - so, we may have to fix remote management with a remotely controlled >>>

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use

2013-10-29 Thread Aron Xu
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Aron Xu wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: >>> ]] Aron Xu >>> > IPMI would be lovely, but I'm not sure we can locate a board right now > with > that - so, w

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use

2013-10-29 Thread Aron Xu
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Aron Xu wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Aron Xu wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]]

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use

2013-10-29 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Aron Xu wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES > wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Aron Xu wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: ]] Aron Xu > > IPMI would be lovely, but I'm not sure we can

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use

2013-10-29 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Aron Xu wrote: > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES > wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Aron Xu wrote: >>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES >>> wrote: On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:35 PM, Aron Xu wrote: > On Wed,

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use

2013-10-29 Thread Bastien ROUCARIES
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Aron Xu wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Aron Xu wrote: On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote: >>

MIPS64EL port box is ready for use (Was: mips64el port build failed list)

2013-10-25 Thread YunQiang Su
After more than half of a year's hard work, we have the mips64el port almost done. Now we have more than 7600 packages build successfully. The current build status can be found in http://vip.moonux.org/attempted/ Now I get a new board and give it 18GiB DDR3 memory and 1TB hardisk. Most important i

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use (Was: mips64el port build failed list)

2013-10-25 Thread Paul Wise
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:22 AM, YunQiang Su wrote: > After more than half of a year's hard work, we have the mips64el port > almost done. > Now we have more than 7600 packages build successfully. Congrats! Please create a page on the Debian wiki and or update the MIPSPort wiki page about this

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use (Was: mips64el port build failed list)

2013-10-29 Thread Graham Whaley
On 25 October 2013 17:22, YunQiang Su wrote: > After more than half of a year's hard work, we have the mips64el port > almost done. > Now we have more than 7600 packages build successfully. > The current build status can be found in http://vip.moonux.org/attempted/ > Hey! - well done. That's qui

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use (Was: mips64el port build failed list)

2013-10-29 Thread YunQiang Su
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Graham Whaley wrote: > On 25 October 2013 17:22, YunQiang Su wrote: > >> After more than half of a year's hard work, we have the mips64el port >> almost done. >> Now we have more than 7600 packages build successfully. >> The current build status can be found in ht

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use (Was: mips64el port build failed list)

2013-10-29 Thread YunQiang Su
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Paul Wise wrote: > On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 12:22 AM, YunQiang Su wrote: > >> After more than half of a year's hard work, we have the mips64el port >> almost done. >> Now we have more than 7600 packages build successfully. > > Congrats! > > Please create a page on t

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use (Was: mips64el port build failed list)

2013-10-29 Thread Graham Whaley
On 29 October 2013 11:50, YunQiang Su wrote: [snip] > > Nice. Can I ask which board that is? I have some boards reserved for me > in > > Loongson that I am highly likely to purchase, and suspect (but would > like to > > confirm) that they are the same board that you are using. I will also > check

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use (Was: mips64el port build failed list)

2013-10-29 Thread Aron Xu
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Graham Whaley wrote: > On 25 October 2013 17:22, YunQiang Su wrote: > >> After more than half of a year's hard work, we have the mips64el port >> almost done. >> Now we have more than 7600 packages build successfully. >> The current build status can be found in ht

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use (Was: mips64el port build failed list)

2013-10-29 Thread Aron Xu
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Graham Whaley wrote: > > > > On 29 October 2013 11:50, YunQiang Su wrote: > [snip] >> >> > Nice. Can I ask which board that is? I have some boards reserved for me >> > in >> > Loongson that I am highly likely to purchase, and suspect (but would >> > like to >> > c

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use (Was: mips64el port build failed list)

2013-10-29 Thread YunQiang Su
On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:50 PM, Graham Whaley wrote: > > > > On 29 October 2013 13:34, Aron Xu wrote: >> >> >> It would require much more resource to spend on making more ports, >> this means more build machines and man power, which is not sufficient >> at mean time. >> > > True. I hopefully ha

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use (Was: mips64el port build failed list)

2013-10-29 Thread Graham Whaley
On 29 October 2013 13:40, Aron Xu wrote: > > What we are running isn't any of them, and the 2-way server board > looks promising. > > Thanks both. OK, so I've no details from Loongson about the boards they have for me yet either - I suspect it may be the same as your board. What we need to consi

Re: MIPS64EL port box is ready for use (Was: mips64el port build failed list)

2013-10-29 Thread Graham Whaley
On 29 October 2013 13:34, Aron Xu wrote: > > It would require much more resource to spend on making more ports, > this means more build machines and man power, which is not sufficient > at mean time. > > True. I hopefully have some resource coming online, and I may also have some in-house build h