On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Florian Weimer wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Florian Weimer wrote:
Personally, what made me stick to Exim so far is the ability to
configure retry behavior on a per-domain basis. One of my mail servers
Postfix does that too. You direct the domains to a different
* Miles Bader:
Postfix has a reputation for being faster and more secure than exim.
Nowadays, the Postfix code base is larger than the Exim code base.
Why is it worth worrying about, though? Are the difference between exim
and postfix really great enough to matter for typical use?!?
* Henrique de Moraes Holschuh:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Florian Weimer wrote:
Personally, what made me stick to Exim so far is the ability to
configure retry behavior on a per-domain basis. One of my mail servers
Postfix does that too. You direct the domains to a different transport, and
On Fri, 23 Nov 2007, Florian Weimer wrote:
Personally, what made me stick to Exim so far is the ability to
configure retry behavior on a per-domain basis. One of my mail servers
Postfix does that too. You direct the domains to a different transport, and
setup that transport with whichever
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Miles Bader wrote:
Why is it worth worrying about, though? Are the difference between exim
and postfix really great enough to matter for typical use?!?
No, they are not. And I speak this as a Postfix user (I replace exim with
postfix in every box I use or admin, and all
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:41:20PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
Postfix has a reputation for being faster and more secure than exim.
When talking about security, exim doesn't exactly have a horribly bad
track record. It's not qmail, but then I wouldn't *want* to use qmail
for other reasons.
Why
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 01:44:51 +0900, Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Just to be sure... I am running postfix now just to find out the same
questions you have...
I see no practical reason to run postfix on desktop machine now except
if postfix is something you are very familiar with...
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For me, exim4 is better:
* less memory on run time
* mailname is implimented as expected by the policy.
Postfix has a reputation for being faster and more secure than exim.
Why is it worth worrying about, though? Are the difference between exim
and
* MJ Ray:
I believe http://www.postfix.org/ADDRESS_VERIFICATION_README.html
details the facility you're looking for.
I don't believe it does. I don't want to verify the recipient address
- I want to try delivering the redirected mail and avoid being left
holding the baby if the destination
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of removing data on you, it may be interesting to edit the
following text to provide information on you and also add section on why
you think exim is better as note on wiki.
http://wiki.debian.org/DefaultMTA
There is no link to edit that page.
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:36:06 +
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. it doesn't seem to have as many anti-spam possibilities as Exim -
there's postgrey for greylisting, but how can I tarpit RBL matches and
other offences?
A quick 'apt-cache search postfix' lists a number of different policy
1. it doesn't seem to have as many anti-spam possibilities as Exim -
there's postgrey for greylisting, but how can I tarpit RBL matches and
other offences?
Look at policyd-weight, for example.
2. when an email that I'm forwarding (due to /etc/aliases or a
.forward or whatever) comes in,
Just to be sure...
I am running postfix now just to find out the same questions you have...
I see no practical reason to run postfix on desktop machine now except
if postfix is something you are very familiar with... As you mght have
expected, Manoj who is one of the best DD and wants to
Osamu Aoki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After seeing recent post(*) on the default MTA issue, I did some
research and experiment on MTAs. They are summarized at:
http://wiki.debian.org/DefaultMTA
Although I am identified as running Postfix there, that was installed
as a test a while ago. Most
Michael Alan Dorman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [...]
Still, if not...well, I wrote an event-driven postfix policy daemon in
perl using POE that's able to handle 100 queries/second on consumer
hardware in a few dozen lines of code.
Thanks for the pointers. Can a policy server delay an incoming
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:31:17 +
MJ Ray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the pointers. Can a policy server delay an incoming mail?
I suspect that sleeping in the perl would delay all incoming mail and
there's no access(5) response like Exim's delay, else I could do it
another way. How
Hi,
After seeing recent post(*) on the default MTA issue, I did some
research and experiment on MTAs. They are summarized at:
http://wiki.debian.org/DefaultMTA
Also good review was found at: http://shearer.org/MTA_Comparison
Although both exim4 and postfix daemons are negligibly small ones
17 matches
Mail list logo
