On Mon, 12 May 2008, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
Afaiui dehs *only* sends emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the question was whether the pts only adds the header to e-mails
generated by its own scripts or also to stuff received by mail. (I
have no idea whether this even a correct dichotomy)
On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 01:44:24PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2008, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
Afaiui dehs *only* sends emails to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the question was whether the pts only adds the header to e-mails
generated by its own scripts or also to stuff received
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
b. Every tool sending automated mail to Debian Developers should add
headers of the form
X-Debian: $TOOL
X-Debian-Package: $PACKAGE
It's probably too late, but wouldn't have been better to use the
following instead?
X-Debian-Tool: $TOOL
On Sunday 11 May 2008 00:56, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Also for messages coming from other sources, i.e. dehs?
Yes, the idea is that such mails have uniform headers. There are no other
sources: it works best if every tool that sends automated mails to Debian
package maintainers uses those
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 09:56:46AM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Thijs Kinkhorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 11 May 2008 00:56, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Also for messages coming from other sources, i.e. dehs?
Yes, the idea is that such mails have uniform headers. There are no other
On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 12:45:49AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
b. Every tool sending automated mail to Debian Developers should add
headers of the form
X-Debian: $TOOL
X-Debian-Package: $PACKAGE
The X-Debian-Package: header can be omitted if it is not possible to
name a
Hi,
On Sat, 10 May 2008, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
X-Debian: $TOOL
X-Debian-Package: $PACKAGE
[...]
As a starting point, and as one tool generating lots of mail to
maintainers, DAK is already generating both headers, other tools
hopefully follow soon.
The PTS now provides those
On Sat, 10 May 2008, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
The X-Debian-Package: header can be omitted if it is not possible to
name a specific source package for a mail, like when the mail is
about multiple packages.
One could consider several X-Debian-Package headers when it is about
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
The PTS now provides those headers as well.
X-Debian: PTS
X-Debian-Package: srcpkg
Also for messages coming from other sources, i.e. dehs?
Just want to know if I have to make dehs add those headers.
Cheers,
Cheers,
Raphael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Sat, 10 May 2008, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
b. Every tool sending automated mail to Debian Developers should add
headers of the form
X-Debian: $TOOL
X-Debian-Package: $PACKAGE
The BTS already does the latter using X-Debian-PR-Package: $PACKAGE,
with mails regarding multiple
10 matches
Mail list logo
