On Sunday 08 June 2008 02:55:23 am Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 09:24:45 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I found those issues as well (there are 84 packages failing to build
> > because of that). I discussed this briefly on #debian-x, but it's not
> > clear yet if the X maintain
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 09:24:45 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I found those issues as well (there are 84 packages failing to build
> because of that). I discussed this briefly on #debian-x, but it's not
> clear yet if the X maintainers want to revert this change.
>
> I would personally prefer i
(Cced debian-x@)
On 07/06/08 at 21:13 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 07:26:05PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> > From the changelog for xorg 1:7.3+11:
>
> > * Remove the dependency of xutils against xutils-dev, it was only useful
> > for transitional purpose in Etch
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 07:26:05PM -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> From the changelog for xorg 1:7.3+11:
> * Remove the dependency of xutils against xutils-dev, it was only useful
> for transitional purpose in Etch, closes: #418123.
> This means that any package which used xmkmf/imake and h
From the changelog for xorg 1:7.3+11:
* Remove the dependency of xutils against xutils-dev, it was only useful
for transitional purpose in Etch, closes: #418123.
This means that any package which used xmkmf/imake and had xutils, instead of
xutils-dev, for the Build-Depends will now FTBFS.
5 matches
Mail list logo
