Re: Mass bugs filing: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-17 Thread Domenico Andreoli
On Sun, Nov 08, 2020 at 10:28:54PM +, Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > Hi All, Hi, > This is a new list for the autopkgtest superficial test. > > If the test done in the autopkgtest does not provide significant test > coverage then it should be marked with "Restrictions: superficial". > Ref: >

Re: Mass bugs filing: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-10 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Hi All, On Sun, Nov 8, 2020 at 10:28 PM Sudip Mukherjee wrote: > > Hi All, > > This is a new list for the autopkgtest superficial test. > > > Attached is the dd-list. Modified dd-list after discussion with the javascript maintainer team. -- Regards Sudip dd-list Description: Binary data

Mass bugs filing: autopkgtest must be marked superficial

2020-11-08 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Hi All, This is a new list for the autopkgtest superficial test. If the test done in the autopkgtest does not provide significant test coverage then it should be marked with "Restrictions: superficial". Ref: https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/blob/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst

Mass bugs filing: autopkgtest must be marked superficial (new list)

2020-09-27 Thread Sudip Mukherjee
Hi All, This is a new list for the autopkgtest superficial test. If the test done in the autopkgtest does not provide significant test coverage then it should be marked with "Restrictions: superficial". Ref: https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/autopkgtest/-/blob/master/doc/README.package-tests.rst