Am Donnerstag, 22. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:37:16 +0100, Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> > Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
> >> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:44 -0300, Margarita Manterola
> >>
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> >>
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:37:16 +0100, Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
>> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:44 -0300, Margarita Manterola
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> > On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
Am Mittwoch, 21. März 2007 schrieb Manoj Srivastava:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:44 -0300, Margarita Manterola
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a
> >> version number like
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 15:56:44 -0300, Margarita Manterola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a
>> version number like: 1.0.8~rc1-1 ?
> If you use that number, the upstream ver
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 06:40:43AM +0100, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> If you're building packages for Debian, you should use a Debian machine, not
> an Ubuntu machine.
FWIW, you can install cross-distro chroots and use them to build
packages if you need to. Not necessarily recommended for
offici
On Thursday 15 March 2007 11:31, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2007 schrieb Gunnar Wolf:
> > Please set up the headers accordingly in your mail client :)
>
> What's wrong with my headers?
Nothing AFAICS, at least not according to the Code of Conduct of these mailing
lists. G
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Roman Müllenschläder:
> Hi there ...
>
> I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a version
> number like: 1.0.8~rc1-1 ?
>
> Reason is the following: I have this packages on my repository for making
> it available to users for testing pupo
Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2007 schrieb Gunnar Wolf:
> Roman Müllenschläder dijo [Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:43:56PM +0100]:
> > > > > So, why are you using a version that's not the one in testing, nor
> > > > > the one in stable?
> > > >
> > > > Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is ru
Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2007 schrieb Gunnar Wolf:
> Please set up the headers accordingly in your mail client :)
What's wrong with my headers?
Lg
Roman
On Tuesday 13 March 2007 20.23:16 Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
> Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running Edgy ;)
>
> Maybe I should compile lintian by hand ... tried using sources from
> feisty but they need to much dependencies ...
If you're building packages for Debian,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 12:28:31PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Why is every question I'm asking here treated like me beeing a child in
> > time,
> > not able to do the logical?
> >
> > Testing a package is useless and senseless ... I know that well!
>
> HUH!?!?
>
> Ummmh... If that's how you
Roman Müllenschläder dijo [Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 12:16:31AM +0100]:
> > If you're developing packages for Debian, not Ubuntu, I would
> > suggest at a minimum that you do your builds in a Sid chroot
> > (pbuilder and/or UML work well for this too, depending on how
> > powerful your system is). I do
Roman Müllenschläder dijo [Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:43:56PM +0100]:
> > > > So, why are you using a version that's not the one in testing, nor the
> > > > one in stable?
> > >
> > > Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running Edgy ;)
> >
> > I know I'm stating the obvious here
Roman Müllenschläder dijo [Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:23:16PM +0100]:
> > The versions for lintian (from packages.qa.debian.org) are:
> >
> > Stable: 1.23.8
> > Testing:1.23.28
> > Unstable: 1.23.28
> >
> > So, why are you using a version that's not the one in testing, nor the
> > one in stab
Am Mittwoch, 14. März 2007 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> Hi,
>
> Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
> > The problem is that the mentioned lintian warning was fixed in .27 .. so
> > if testing and unstable are using .28, there should be no problem with
> > just ignoring the warnings for now and see what my _te
Hi,
Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
> The problem is that the mentioned lintian warning was fixed in .27 .. so if
> testing and unstable are using .28, there should be no problem with just
> ignoring the warnings for now and see what my _tests_ on debian will
No, that's wrong. *Build* also on Debia
Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb The Fungi:
> > On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:23:16PM +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
> > > Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running
> > > Edgy ;)
> >
> > If you're developing packages for
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb The Fungi:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:23:16PM +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
> [...]
>
> > Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running
> > Edgy ;)
>
> [...]
>
> If you're developing packages for Debian, not Ubuntu, I would
> suggest at
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 08:23:16PM +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
[...]
> Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running
> Edgy ;)
[...]
If you're developing packages for Debian, not Ubuntu, I would
suggest at a minimum that you do your builds in a Sid chroot
(pbuilder and/o
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Margarita Manterola:
> On 3/13/07, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 20:23 +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
> > > > If you use that number, the upstream version should be 1.0.8~rc1. Is
> > > > that the upstream number? If you wan
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Peter Samuelson:
> [Roman Müllenschläder]
>
> > > So, why are you using a version that's not the one in testing, nor the
> > > one in stable?
> >
> > Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running Edgy ;)
>
> I know I'm stating the obvious here
[Roman Müllenschläder]
> > So, why are you using a version that's not the one in testing, nor the
> > one in stable?
>
> Because my laptop, where I'm building the packages on, is running Edgy ;)
I know I'm stating the obvious here ... but you shouldn't try to
develop packages for Debian exclusiv
On 3/13/07, sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 20:23 +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
> > If you use that number, the upstream version should be 1.0.8~rc1. Is
> > that the upstream number? If you want to have release candidates of
> > your _own_ package, you should d
hi roman,
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 20:23 +0100, Roman Müllenschläder wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Margarita Manterola:
> > On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a
> > > version number like: 1.
Am Dienstag, 13. März 2007 schrieb Margarita Manterola:
> On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a
> > version number like: 1.0.8~rc1-1 ?
>
> If you use that number, the upstream version should be 1.0.8~rc1.
On 3/13/07, Roman Müllenschläder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a version
number like: 1.0.8~rc1-1 ?
If you use that number, the upstream version should be 1.0.8~rc1. Is
that the upstream number? If you want to have release candid
Hi there ...
I'm packaging for debian right now and wanted to now if I may use a version
number like: 1.0.8~rc1-1 ?
Reason is the following: I have this packages on my repository for making it
available to users for testing puposes. I know that the initial release
should be 1.0.8-1. So if I do
27 matches
Mail list logo
