* Ralf Wildenhues
| * Tollef Fog Heen wrote on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:45:03PM CEST:
| > * Ralf Wildenhues
| >
| > | I would be much happier if someone with time would just help to put
| > | this into libtool properly as an option (and possible adjust pkg-config,
| > | FWIW). I'm pretty sure i
Hi Tollef,
Sorry for the high response latency.
* Tollef Fog Heen wrote on Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 09:45:03PM CEST:
> * Ralf Wildenhues
>
> | I would be much happier if someone with time would just help to put
> | this into libtool properly as an option (and possible adjust pkg-config,
> | FWIW).
* Ralf Wildenhues
| I would be much happier if someone with time would just help to put
| this into libtool properly as an option (and possible adjust pkg-config,
| FWIW). I'm pretty sure it would minimize the combined amount of work,
| with increased benefit.
pkg-config has the necessary patch
[ please cc: me on replies ]
* Ron Johnson wrote:
> What are the opinions of d-d's of --as-needed?
>
> According to this thread, the number of dependencies can sometimes
> be slashed drastically.
I would be much happier if someone with time would just help to put
this into libtool properly as an
On Apr 1, 2005 1:58 PM, Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Gustavo Franco
>
> | I agree, but are we tracking all these post-sarge issues that are
> | coming on d-d and others lists? I hope that after sarge we start
> | working on these issues before etch came closer.
>
> I'm doing a r
* Gustavo Franco
| I agree, but are we tracking all these post-sarge issues that are
| coming on d-d and others lists? I hope that after sarge we start
| working on these issues before etch came closer.
I'm doing a rebuild of sarge with a changed pkg-config now, to see
what breaks.
--
Tollef F
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 03:09:13AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le vendredi 01 avril 2005 à 02:34 -0600, Ron Johnson a écrit :
> > > What are the opinions of d-d's of --as-needed?
>
> > > http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I'm moving all my packages to use it. It's not only a workaround for
> libtool or pkgconfig bugs, it's also a great tool when some upstream
> authors gratuitously adds unneeded -l flags.
General note: you have to be careful with
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 06:01:27AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> And since these are (always?) dependencies on shared objects,
> these libraries never get used, except to say, "Here I am!",
> right?
The runtime linker still loads them, which can be expensive (esp.
if there are many relocation recor
On Apr 1, 2005 7:32 AM, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:24:23PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > * Andrew Suffield
> >
> > | It's a method of working around bugs. Just fix the bugs
> > | instead. Update libtool to the latest version and don't -l stuff you
>
On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 03:09 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le vendredi 01 avril 2005 à 02:34 -0600, Ron Johnson a écrit :
> > > What are the opinions of d-d's of --as-needed?
>
> > > http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:53:27PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 01 avril 2005 à 02:34 -0600, Ron Johnson a écrit :
> > What are the opinions of d-d's of --as-needed?
> > http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=17287
> > According to this thread, the number of dependencies can
Le vendredi 01 avril 2005 à 02:34 -0600, Ron Johnson a écrit :
> What are the opinions of d-d's of --as-needed?
>
> http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=17287
>
> According to this thread, the number of dependencies can sometimes
> be slashed drastically.
I'm moving all my packages to us
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:24:23PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Andrew Suffield
>
> | It's a method of working around bugs. Just fix the bugs
> | instead. Update libtool to the latest version and don't -l stuff you
> | don't need to -l.
>
> pkgconfig does add a bunch of gratious -l, similar
* Andrew Suffield
| It's a method of working around bugs. Just fix the bugs
| instead. Update libtool to the latest version and don't -l stuff you
| don't need to -l.
pkgconfig does add a bunch of gratious -l, similar to what libtool
used to. This will be fixed, but I'm not sure I want to intro
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 02:34:44AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> What are the opinions of d-d's of --as-needed?
It's a method of working around bugs. Just fix the bugs
instead. Update libtool to the latest version and don't -l stuff you
don't need to -l.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew
What are the opinions of d-d's of --as-needed?
http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=17287
According to this thread, the number of dependencies can sometimes
be slashed drastically.
(Of course, it would have to wait until Sarge becomes Stable.)
--
---
17 matches
Mail list logo