On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 15:43:26 +0100, gregor herrmann
wrote:
>On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 10:29:13 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:26:46 +0100, Christoph Biedl
>> wrote:
>> >Finally, there's a thing called "trust": I trust the Release
On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 10:29:13 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:26:46 +0100, Christoph Biedl
> wrote:
> >Finally, there's a thing called "trust": I trust the Release Team does
> >this solely in order to keep the freeze time as short as possible,
>
On Sun, 13 Nov 2016 11:07:18 +0100, Christoph Biedl
wrote:
>Marc Haber wrote...
>
>> This is exactly the problem I have with the current policy: I fail to
>> see why this measure will shorten the freeze.
>
>I don't. But I'd say we'll just watch what's going to
Marc Haber wrote...
> This is exactly the problem I have with the current policy: I fail to
> see why this measure will shorten the freeze.
I don't. But I'd say we'll just watch what's going to happen and resume
this discussion once stretch is released.
Chri- "somewhen December 2017" stoph
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:17:57 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
wrote:
>And yes, we will give exceptions on a case by case basis, as we have always
>done.
This will create a third class of packages: The ones that are not
important enough to get an exception, which will in turn
On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 08:26:46 +0100, Christoph Biedl
wrote:
>Finally, there's a thing called "trust": I trust the Release Team does
>this solely in order to keep the freeze time as short as possible,
>everybody hates that time anyway. This trust was created by the
On 10/11/16 08:26, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> Ian Jackson wrote...
>
>> I think what is really worrying people is the fear that they might
>> miss something, for good reasons, and then find that their work that
>> they care about is thrown out of stretch.
>>
>> It is difficult to address this fear
Ian Jackson wrote...
> I think what is really worrying people is the fear that they might
> miss something, for good reasons, and then find that their work that
> they care about is thrown out of stretch.
>
> It is difficult to address this fear with logical arguments intended
> to demonstrate
gregor herrmann writes ("Re: More 5 november in the release schedule"):
> I don't quite understand where all this fuzz about auto-removals
> suddenly comes from. The auto-removals exist since Septemer 2013 [0]
> and they were also in place for the jessie freeze [1], with the small
> difference
9 matches
Mail list logo