Re: Mounts with fs type 'none'

On Sep 27, Steve Greenland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (And why does mount(8) document '--bind' but not '-t none' or '-o bind'?) Because -o bind is the old API and you are not supposed to use it. -- ciao, Marco

Re: Mounts with fs type 'none'

On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Steve Greenland wrote: mount -t none -o bind /somewhere /some/where/else Thanks. Does anything else use '-t none'? Swapspace. But that's hardly an issue... -- wouter dot verhelst at advalvas in Belgium This is Linux world. On a quiet day, you can hear Windows reboot.

Mounts with fs type 'none'

I've a request to have checksecurity skip searching filesystems with type 'none' (not device 'none'). A brief check leads me to believe that these are result of mount --bind, which means that the mount in question is either searched or skipped in its real location, and need not be searched in its

Re: Mounts with fs type 'none'

On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 06:15:34PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: I've a request to have checksecurity skip searching filesystems with type 'none' (not device 'none'). A brief check leads me to believe that these are result of mount --bind, which means that the mount in question correct, mount

Re: Mounts with fs type 'none'

On 26-Sep-01, 18:31 (CDT), Ethan Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 06:15:34PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: I've a request to have checksecurity skip searching filesystems with type 'none' (not device 'none'). A brief check leads me to believe that these are result of

Re: Mounts with fs type 'none'

On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 06:53:54PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote: Thanks. Does anything else use '-t none'? i don't know, not that i know of, but i wouldn't rule it out in the future given `none' is pretty generic. (And why does mount(8) document '--bind' but not '-t none' or '-o bind'?) i