On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:08:27PM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> In fact, the parts you have chosen to keep, and respond to, are the far
> *less* relevant portions of what I wrote. They existed as a demonstration
> only of one reason I consider it important for people to have some
> agreement on what
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 10:30:01AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 06:01:26PM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:06:06AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 10:52:48AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> > > > [1] Which is a separate ran
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 06:01:26PM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:06:06AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 10:52:48AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> > > [1] Which is a separate rant, and frankly, I think Debian needs to be
> > > clear about what we real
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:06:06AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 10:52:48AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> > [1] Which is a separate rant, and frankly, I think Debian needs to be
> > clear about what we really mean by "We won't hide probles" in our Social
> > Contract
>
> It
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 10:52:48AM -0700, Joel Aelwyn wrote:
> [1] Which is a separate rant, and frankly, I think Debian needs to be
> clear about what we really mean by "We won't hide probles" in our Social
> Contract
It's a literal statement. We won't hide them. As always with the
social contrac
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 08:25:22AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:28:25 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I think ftp-master already has a more complex prioritizing than
> >that. Adding a new kernel images deb tends to be real fast (with
> >exceptions),
6 matches
Mail list logo
