Re: devfsd also (was: NMU of sitecopy ?)

2001-01-10 Thread Russell Coker
On Wednesday 10 January 2001 06:40, Brian Frederick Kimball wrote: > The devfsd package could also use an NMU or two. It has apparently been > ignored by Tom Lee for months. Almost all of its bugs appear to be > fairly trivial, and he's only responded to one of the 11 open bugs (and > that respon

devfsd also (was: NMU of sitecopy ?)

2001-01-09 Thread Brian Frederick Kimball
The devfsd package could also use an NMU or two. It has apparently been ignored by Tom Lee for months. Almost all of its bugs appear to be fairly trivial, and he's only responded to one of the 11 open bugs (and that response was three months ago). I'm not trying to 'dis' Tom; he may very well ha

NMU of sitecopy ?

2001-01-09 Thread Gregor Hoffleit
Tom, the sitecopy package is heavily out of date. sitecopy in sid is at 0.9.10 (the upstream release as of Apr 2000). Since then, there were more than ten new upstream releases with various major improvements. The most recent upstream version is now 0.10.12. The bug page for sitecopy lists variou