Re: New PAM in experimental needs testing

2007-08-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 06:36:45PM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > Several of the Debian-specific patches should probably be removed. > For example, the @include (Debian-specific) syntax should be replaced > by the include mechanism added by upstream; we should make this a > release goal for Lenny IMO.

Re: New PAM in experimental needs testing

2007-08-06 Thread Roger Leigh
Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:36:45 +0100, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >>A new version of PAM (0.99.7.1-1) has been packaged and uploaded to >>experimental. This is intended to replace 0.79-4. However, because >>there have been quite a number of ups

Re: New PAM in experimental needs testing

2007-08-06 Thread Jan Christoph Nordholz
Hi Marc, > Does it help when I try installing unstable, upgrading to new pam and > then check whether login and ssh server still works? i canont do this > before tomorrow night, and can only do very basic testing. sure. On a side note, when you do so: pam upstream has introduced symbol versioning

Re: New PAM in experimental needs testing

2007-08-06 Thread Marc Haber
On Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:36:45 +0100, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >A new version of PAM (0.99.7.1-1) has been packaged and uploaded to >experimental. This is intended to replace 0.79-4. However, because >there have been quite a number of upstream changes, and all the >Debian-specific pat

New PAM in experimental needs testing

2007-08-05 Thread Roger Leigh
Hi folks, A new version of PAM (0.99.7.1-1) has been packaged and uploaded to experimental. This is intended to replace 0.79-4. However, because there have been quite a number of upstream changes, and all the Debian-specific patches against the old one were painstakingly re-diffed and updated by