On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 07:47:08AM -, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> In theory. I don't know if there are any statistics on 'popular'
> 3rdparty repositories and their keys.
I suspect src:extrepo-data is a good starting point for anyone interested
in generating such statistics...
--
cheers,
tate their PPAs’ keys
> (I vaguely recall searching for that and not finding it once).
It is not possible to rotate your PPA keys yourself, but Canonical is
handling it according to
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/new-requirements-for-apt-repository-signing-in-24-04/42854
Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
Sune Vuorela dixit:
>In theory. I don't know if there are any statistics on 'popular'
>3rdparty repositories and their keys. But assuming they're doing key
Hm. My own private repo should be ok (3072R), but my Launchpad PPAs
incidentally are not okay (1024D).
Since this comes from Canonical,
On 2024-03-03, RL wrote:
> It does - but also makes me wonder: is this going to affect Debian users
> with 3rd party repositories when they upgrade to trixie? (or is that not
> yet known?)
In theory. I don't know if there are any statistics on 'popular'
3rdparty repositories and their keys. But
Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues writes:
>> APT 2.7.13 just landed in unstable and with GnuPG 2.4.5 installed,
>> requires repositories
>> to be signed using one of
>>
>> - RSA keys of at least 2048 bit
>> - Ed25519
>> - Ed448
>>
>> Any other keys will cause warnings. These warnings will
in driver to do the change *now*.
> >
> > If you operate third-party repositories using different key
> > algorithms, now is your time to migrate before you get hit
> > with an error.
> >
> > For the Ubuntu perspective, feel free to check out the discourse
>
On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 01:02:38AM +0100, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> > Any other keys will cause warnings. These warnings will become
> > errors in March as we harden it up for the Ubuntu 24.04 release
>
> Perhaps the announcement should have been sent earlier than 28th Feb then. Or
> is there a
Hi,
Quoting Julian Andres Klode (2024-02-28 20:20:12)
> APT 2.7.13 just landed in unstable and with GnuPG 2.4.5 installed,
> or 2.4.4 with a backport from the 2.4 branch, requires repositories
> to be signed using one of
>
> - RSA keys of at least 2048 bit
> - Ed25519
> - Ed448
>
> Any other
now is your time to migrate before you get hit
> with an error.
>
> For the Ubuntu perspective, feel free to check out the discourse
> post:
>
> https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/new-requirements-for-apt-repository-signing-in-24-04/42854
Hi,
Could I be pointed to the public co
9 matches
Mail list logo
