At 1996-07-25 16:29 +, Guy Maor wrote:
>On Tue, 23 Jul 1996, Michael Shields wrote:
>
>> Shouldn't all non-cosmetic bugs [in buzz] be fixed?
>
>No, only serious bugs and security holes. Otherwise there would be no
>difference betweem rex and buzz. The definition of 'serious' is a bit
>vague (
> The problem with this approach is that it breaks everything that assumes
> that make is the GNU make - for instance, the kernel. And probably several
> debian.rules files.
It would probably be a fair assumption to say that make, under Linux, is
GNU make: the average user would have this inst
"Brian C. White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I propose to add the following virtual packages:
> > >
> > > - gnu-makeuseful for packages like kernel-package and my new
> > > compress-package (not yet released) that *need* a GNU make
> > > to be used.
> >
>
3 matches
Mail list logo
