#include
* Xavier Roche [Thu, Jul 03 2003, 04:15:22PM]:
> I was looking for the very simple "crc32" binary to compute checksums for
> files, and couldn't find it. There is a crc32 perl lib, but no crc32 package.
> I know that md5 (or even sha-160) hash fingerprints are better, but in many
> cas
On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 04:25:25PM +0200, Benjamin Drieu wrote:
> Doesn't cksfv does the job ?
Absolutely - I did not find it in the first time, as the primary goal was to
generate sfv files (but you can get the CRC inside it)
Xavier Roche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was looking for the very simple "crc32" binary to compute
> checksums for files, and couldn't find it. There is a crc32 perl
> lib, but no crc32 package. I know that md5 (or even sha-160) hash
> fingerprints are better, but in many cases (like tar archi
I was looking for the very simple "crc32" binary to compute checksums for
files, and couldn't find it. There is a crc32 perl lib, but no crc32 package. I
know that md5 (or even sha-160) hash fingerprints are better, but in many cases
(like tar archives on tapes, or ftp files) you have only CRC-3
4 matches
Mail list logo
