Your message dated Sat, 11 Apr 2009 22:42:33 -0500
with message-id <200904112242.34075.atom...@gmail.com>
and subject line Re: [php-maint] Bug#522855: depending on obsolete packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #522855,
regarding depending on obsolete packages
to be marked as done.
On Monday 06 April 2009 18:49:24 jida...@jidanni.org wrote:
> Package: php5-mcrypt
> Version: 5.2.9.dfsg.1-1
> Severity: serious
>
> Depending on obsolete packages
> # aptitude -F %p search ?obsolete xargs -n 1 echo aptitude why|sh -x
> + aptitude why libltdl3
> i php5
One finds packages depending on obsolete packages, e.g.,
# aptitude -F %p search ?obsolete | xargs -n 1 echo aptitude why|sh -x
+ aptitude why libicu38
i gimpDepends libwebkit-1.0-1 (>= 1.0.1)
i A libwebkit-1.0-1 Depends libicu38 (>= 3.8-5)
+ aptitude why libltdl3
i php5-
apt-show-versions | grep /experimental
should work too, but I haven't tested it (no experimental packages
installed on this machine)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 04:25:52PM +0100, Jérôme Warnier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Le vendredi 20 janvier 2006 à 14:17 +, Paul Brossier a écrit :
> > On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:09:28AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> > >
> > > [Jérôme Warnier]
> > > > Or even better: a list of a
Le vendredi 20 janvier 2006 à 15:04 +0100, Michal Politowski a écrit :
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:34:11 +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> [...]
> > BTW, is there a way to list all packages in experimental?
>
> aptitude search '~Aexperimental'
>
> > Or even better: a list of all packages already instal
Le vendredi 20 janvier 2006 à 14:17 +, Paul Brossier a écrit :
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:09:28AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
> >
> > [Jérôme Warnier]
> > > Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
> > > which have an experimental version?
> >
> > There might
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:09:28AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> [Jérôme Warnier]
> > Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
> > which have an experimental version?
>
> There might be a better way, but assuming you have experimental in your
> sources.list...
>
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:34:11 +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
[...]
> BTW, is there a way to list all packages in experimental?
aptitude search '~Aexperimental'
> Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
> which have an experimental version?
aptitude search '~i~Aexperime
[Jérôme Warnier]
> Or even better: a list of all packages already installed on my system
> which have an experimental version?
There might be a better way, but assuming you have experimental in your
sources.list...
t=$(tempfile);
awk > $t '/^Package:/{print "^" $2 "$"}' \
/var/lib/apt/li
Le jeudi 19 janvier 2006 à 16:38 +, Adam D. Barratt a écrit :
> On Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:35 AM, Jérôme Warnier
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
> > generally considered acceptable t
On Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:35 AM, Jérôme Warnier
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
> generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
> experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0
Le jeudi 19 janvier 2006 à 12:43 +0100, Frank Lichtenheld a écrit :
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:35:45PM +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> > After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
> > generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
&
[Jérôme Warnier]
> After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
> generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
> experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1).
Hmmm, I thought experimental was garbage-collected automaticall
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 12:35:45PM +0100, Jérôme Warnier wrote:
> After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
> generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
> experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1).
>
> If not,
After the last update of OOo in Sid (aka Unstable), I wonder if it is
generally considered acceptable to keep obsolete packages in
experimental (currently, Sid has 2.0.1-2 and Experimental 2.0.1-1).
If not, is there a way to remove packages from Experimental?
Regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
#include
* Brian M. Carlson [Wed, Jun 22 2005, 10:01:49PM]:
> > iceme or icepref installed should see a new version, which brings in
> > icewmcp. What is the best way in which to accomplish this?
>
> Make iceme and icepref dummy packages that just depend on icewmcp.
And please make symlinks (o
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 17:43 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I was planning on adopting iceme and icepref. However, both are no
> longer active upstream. They are now modules of the IceWM Control Panel
> (IceWMCP). I will package IceWMCP soon. However, I would like to
> ensure that users with
I was planning on adopting iceme and icepref. However, both are no
longer active upstream. They are now modules of the IceWM Control Panel
(IceWMCP). I will package IceWMCP soon. However, I would like to
ensure that users with iceme or icepref currently installed see icewmcp
as the "next versio
I'm considering asking ftp maintainers to remove from the archive the
following software/documentation I maintain. Actually, I haven't done any
maintenance tasks in most of these for months, in many cases upstream is
dead and the userbase is really low (or inexistant).
Feel free to speak up if
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 10:08:13AM +0200, Petr Cech wrote:
> > manpages-net
>
> this package appeared only for a short time (and yes, I have it installed
> too). I think it was in Incoming only.
How about re-creating it?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 09:41:29AM +0200 , Michael Meskes wrote:
> After upgrading my machine I found some obsolete packages. Before purging
> them I'd like to know if there are replacements:
> lde
yes. it had RC, and it is still in mess due to some strange gcc header
interactions
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:15:22AM -0500, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> > > eaudio
> > Um, xmms I think.
> Since xmms does not mention eaudio anywhere in its control file I though
> these two programs were completely different.
Well, the author of eaudi
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:15:22AM -0500, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> > eaudio
>
> Um, xmms I think.
Since xmms does not mention eaudio anywhere in its control file I though
these two programs were completely different.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heus
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 02:25:16PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> # apt-get install intlfonts-european
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Package intlfonts-european has no available version, but exists in the
> database.
> This typically means that the package was me
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 01:57:25PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote a free reimplementation of this,
> gnuhtml2latex, so html2latex was removed.
Got this too. Thanks.
> These both still seem to be in woody.
So maybe they had release critical bugs. I cannot check that right
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> html2latex
tetex, perhaps?
> eaudio
Um, xmms I think.
> gtkbrowser
Hmmm. No idea.
Mike.
Michael Meskes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>After upgrading my machine I found some obsolete packages. Before purging
>them I'd like to know if there are replacements:
>
>html2latex
Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote a free reimplementation of this,
gnuhtml2latex, so html2l
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 09:41:29AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> intlfonts-european
# apt-get install intlfonts-european
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Package intlfonts-european has no available version, but exists in the database.
This typically means that the pa
After upgrading my machine I found some obsolete packages. Before purging
them I'd like to know if there are replacements:
html2latex
eaudio
2utf
lde
intlfonts-european
manpages-net
gtkbrowser
I hope anyone here knows.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-
30 matches
Mail list logo
