On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:23:55PM +0100, Eduard Bloch
wrote:
> #include
> As said bvefore, if you activate this mode manually,
this should be an
> easy feature to add on. How do you want to configure
it?
>
> Eduard.
Hi Eduard,
I was just struck by your choice of phrase. It, in a
way, expresses
On 1/24/06, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> # Set the following value to the maximum age (in hours) for method A or to 0
> # for method B
> expire_hours=0
It seems that if a file is not found, i.e., apt-get update prints an
`Ign', isn't it a good idea to cache, or rather negative cache
On Mon, Jan 23, 2006 at 09:23:55PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> As said bvefore, if you activate this mode manually, this should be an
> easy feature to add on. How do you want to configure it?
>
> Eduard.
Hi Eduard,
I was just struck by your choice of phrase. It, in a way, expresses
On 1/24/06, Eduard Bloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #include
Hi again,
> * Anuradha Ratnaweera [Mon, Jan 23 2006, 06:24:08PM]:
>
> > - Lazy online: we like apt-cacher to fetch a Packages/Release file
> > only if it old as set by a timeout. So if one runs apt-get update
> > many times during a
#include
* Anuradha Ratnaweera [Mon, Jan 23 2006, 06:24:08PM]:
> - Lazy online: we like apt-cacher to fetch a Packages/Release file
> only if it old as set by a timeout. So if one runs apt-get update
> many times during a short period, only the first one will need to make
> a HEAD/GET request.
[Couldn't find any list related to apt-cacher or apt-cacher2, and I
noticed some discussions of them on debian-devel, so I am CCing debian
devel. But if there is a better place to discuss this, please point
me to it, thanks!]
Hi Eduard and Jonathan,
Recently we started using apt-cacher2 extensiv
6 matches
Mail list logo
