> "Peter" == Peter Tobias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Peter> The main configuration file is /etc/inetd.conf. If xinetd is
Peter> installed the first time it should create /etc/xinetd.conf
Peter> based on the current /etc/inetd.conf. If you install a package
Peter> that adds an entry to /etc/in
On Tue, Apr 28, 1998 at 11:05:35PM +0100, Mark Baker wrote:
> We have one. It's called /etc.
This is, mostly, true.
_BUT_ there is a different point about this: System
administrators should be educated to use RCS or CVS for
their configuration files, and they should _not_ edit the
production fil
On Tue, Apr 28, 1998 at 10:59:49AM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> btw: in my opinion debian needs a general resource database (something like
> windows nt registry, but with a better, unixlike implementation).
We have one. It's called /etc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wit
> "Andreas" == Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi
Andreas> take a look at r2d2, a tool written by winfried truemper. it
Andreas> does exactly this : get rid of all init.d scripts for
Andreas> daemons, and offer a way to start them standalone, via inetd
Andreas> or via
On Apr 28, Inaky Perez Gonzalez wrote:
> I'm a rather new and very happy Debian user, and some time ago
> while testing hamm/unstable I came trough a problem I thought deserved
> some time.
>
> I like better xinetd than inetd, so I installed. Despite of it
> trying hard to xlate in
On Tue 28 Apr 1998, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 1998 at 10:59:49AM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> > btw: in my opinion debian needs a general resource database (something like
> > windows nt registry, but with a better, unixlike implementation).
>
> How is the work on COAS going
On Tue, Apr 28, 1998 at 10:59:49AM +0200, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> btw: in my opinion debian needs a general resource database (something like
> windows nt registry, but with a better, unixlike implementation).
How is the work on COAS going on?
--
Enrique Zanardi
take a look at r2d2, a tool written by winfried truemper.
it does exactly this : get rid of all init.d scripts for daemons, and
offer a way to start them standalone, via inetd or via xinetd.
btw: in my opinion debian needs a general resource database (something like
windows nt registry, but with a
Hi
I'm a rather new and very happy Debian user, and some time ago
while testing hamm/unstable I came trough a problem I thought deserved
some time.
I like better xinetd than inetd, so I installed. Despite of it
trying hard to xlate inetd.conf, new services added won't cor
9 matches
Mail list logo
