Re: Packages preventing other packages from going into testing (fwd) (fwd)

2003-06-17 Thread christophe barbe
Looks like your KMail is doing strange things with the In-Reply-To header (using a wrong Message-ID). Your last mail contains: In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> In reply to: Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ie you break all threads you are replying to. Christophe -- Christophe Barbé <[EMAI

Re: Packages preventing other packages from going into testing (fwd) (fwd)

2003-06-17 Thread Jacob Hallén
Peter Mathiasson wrote: >On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Jacob Hallén wrote: >> My program answers the question "Where will an extra effort produce drastic >> results?" I'm sure I could have modified Björns program to yield this output, >> but I don't read and write Perl programs for

Re: Packages preventing other packages from going into testing (fwd)

2003-06-17 Thread Peter Mathiasson
On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 10:58:09PM +0200, Jacob Hallén wrote: > My program answers the question "Where will an extra effort produce drastic > results?" I'm sure I could have modified Björns program to yield this output, > but I don't read and write Perl programs for pleasure. http://bjorn.haxx.s

Re: Packages preventing other packages from going into testing (fwd)

2003-06-16 Thread Jacob Hallén
J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote: >On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 18:44:12 +0200, Jacob Hallén wrote: >> I have written a little Python program that analyses >> http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html >> to find out where the bottlenecks are for packages going into testing. >> Essentially, it is