GTK+ 1.2 has been deprecated upstream for 6 years. There is no security
support for it, and no new applications using it have been out for quite
a long time as well.
Here is a first list of packages that could either be removed right now
because they seem to have replacements, or
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:06:26 +0100
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
digitaldj
= prokyon3
It still works, some people still use it... so I do not see any need to remove
it now. If the time comes to remove gtk+1.2, digitaldj can go too IYAM. I'm
Le jeudi 11 décembre 2008 à 11:46 +0100, Tim Dijkstra a écrit :
It still works, some people still use it... so I do not see any need
to remove it now. If the time comes to remove gtk+1.2, digitaldj can
go too IYAM. I'm not using it anymore, and certainly do not have the
time to port it.
As
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:12:04 +0100
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le jeudi 11 décembre 2008 à 11:46 +0100, Tim Dijkstra a écrit :
It still works, some people still use it... so I do not see any need
to remove it now. If the time comes to remove gtk+1.2, digitaldj can
go too
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
As this reaction is quite common, maybe I should make things more clear.
* Yes, GTK+ 1.2 is going away before the squeeze release. *
If everyone says “I’m going to remove my pet package when it is the last
one”, it is obvious that we are never
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Neil Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we, therefore, just say that unless maintainers remove the package
themselves after the Lenny release, all reverse dependencies of gtk1.2
and gtk1.2 itself will be removed from Debian during the month before
the
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 02:12:04PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 11 d??cembre 2008 ?? 11:46 +0100, Tim Dijkstra a ??crit :
It still works, some people still use it... so I do not see any need
to remove it now. If the time comes to remove gtk+1.2, digitaldj can
go too IYAM. I'm
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:42:08 +0100 (CET)
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
As this reaction is quite common, maybe I should make things more clear.
* Yes, GTK+ 1.2 is going away before the squeeze release. *
If everyone says “I’m
On 2008-12-05 19:06 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
OHURA Makoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xemacs21
= maybe we need to wait for emacs23
I'm not sure that hardcore XEmacs users can be convinced to switch to
Emacs, even if Emacs 23 will provide the necessary eye-candy that is
lacking from Emacs 22.
Dear Neil Gunner,
Thank you for your long, detailed and convincing postings in this
thread. I really appreciate it! The argument that finally made me
surrender was that time is perhaps better spent helping upstream authors
make the conversion. So I guess we're on the same page now. And I'd be
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 02:08:48PM +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear Neil Gunner,
Thank you for your long, detailed and convincing postings in this
thread. I really appreciate it! The argument that finally made me
surrender was that time is perhaps better spent helping
Le mardi 09 décembre 2008 à 14:08 +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard a écrit :
On top of this, asking a scientist for updating the software for a new
version of a toolkit will come as an extra burden. Scientists will see
this as endless quest for your own shadow. When they've finally gotten
around to
Le Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 06:40:48PM -0600, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
There's a testing security team in case you were not aware of it.
Stable and Testing security teams make great work. It is just a shame that
random developers write package X could annoy the security team(s) instead of
I
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] (09/12/2008):
Fortunately, porting to GTK+ 3 is going to be *much* easier. I’ll post
something about it as soon as the upstream release plans are official.
SCNR: 2to3.py
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Charles Plessy dijo [Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 08:48:34AM +0900]:
seecurity is of course important, but as I was told during the last DPL
debate,
it is possible to opt out support from the security team, which is only for
Stable anyway.
Buffer overflows are not the same issues when viewing
Hi folks,
In case any of you are interested/care. Just for kicks I started
digging through many of the r(b)depends for gtk+1.2.
I have posted my notes here:
http://people.debian.org/~bdefreese/gtk+1.2_rdepends_notes
Yes, I know the format is hideous, sorry. I have already done some RM:s
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 10:48 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
As for scientific software, nobody will find the time or the money to
upgrade
from GTK1.2 to GTK2 only for the beauty of it. People are rewarded on their
new
developments, not on code maintainance.
Agree. But people might willing
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 08 décembre 2008 à 08:25 -0600, William Pitcock a écrit :
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 19:08 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Gah, I thought it was able to handle SNES ROMs. The correct answer would
probably be zsnes, although it only works on i386.
On Friday 05 December 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Hi,
GTK+ 1.2 has been deprecated upstream for 6 years. There is no security
support for it, and no new applications using it have been out for quite
a long time as well.
snip/
Cheers,
Why not remove the -dev packages first. That way no
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:52:44 +
David Goodenough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not remove the -dev packages first.
That would make every reverse dependency instantly buggy with
release-critical FTBFS bugs! No thanks! It must be possible to build
all packages in Lenny only from the Debian
On Tuesday 09 December 2008, Neil Williams wrote:
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 17:52:44 +
David Goodenough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not remove the -dev packages first.
That would make every reverse dependency instantly buggy with
release-critical FTBFS bugs! No thanks! It must be possible to
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 19:32:27 +
David Goodenough [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well perhaps what is needed is a way of marking a package as
deprecated, and this was what I was trying (badly) to achieve.
Better to be explicit.
Maybe Section: oldlibs needs to be more forcefully expressed?
Any
Le Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 08:03:31AM +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
Why are people so unwilling to use oldstable
Le Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 10:48:29AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf a écrit :
Well, you can perfectly keep a cluster of Woody
machines for a long time!
OK, I think that you have a good point: if
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Charles Plessy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I think that you have a good point: if removed in Lenny+1, GTK+1.2 will
still be apt-gettable for around three years, and then hopefully forever from
snapshots.debian.org.
And archive.debian.org, which includes
On Sunday 07 December 2008 16:10:34 Charles Plessy wrote:
With its thousands of packages, Debian is not so rich in manpower, so if
the current maintainers of GTK+ 1.2 want to abandon it and the QA team is
not interested in keeping it, there is no other choice than to adopt it
(and its 43
Le lundi 08 décembre 2008 à 14:35 +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard a écrit :
I must admit I was under the impression from this discussion that GTK+
1.2 was
simply _unwanted_ in Debian due to reasons of out-of-dateness and possible
security problems...
Yes, it is unwanted.
I’d like to see it
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 19:08 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 05 décembre 2008 à 21:43 -0600, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
Alain Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gsnes9x
= visualboyadvance ?
C'mon, there are at least 15 years between the two consoles.
And nope,
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 20:42 +0100, Klaus Ethgen wrote:
You forgot xmms. It is still heavily used and there are no alternative
for it. (It is just such a application as xv - very old but there are no
alternative that completely replace it (in all facets).)
There's not?
There's at least 20
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
snip
I am quite willing to adopt the package and maintain it, but I couldn't
find
it on the list of orphans. Maybe I didn't look hard enough? That list is
enormous... :-(
On a side note, I already am attempting to adopt a companion for GTK+ 1.2,
namely gktglarea [1].
William Pitcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] (08/12/2008):
Unless you're talking about the ugly XMMS GUI. In which case, I
believe QMMS is available for packaging.
So says an audacious packager and upstream author.
Pot. Kettle. Black.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Le lundi 08 décembre 2008 à 08:25 -0600, William Pitcock a écrit :
On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 19:08 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Gah, I thought it was able to handle SNES ROMs. The correct answer would
probably be zsnes, although it only works on i386.
Actually, gsnes9x can just be dropped.
William Pitcock wrote:
Unless you're talking about the ugly XMMS GUI. In which case, I believe
QMMS is available for packaging.
You meant 'QMMP'? It reproduces XMMS GUI and it is in unstable already.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
Ukrainian C++
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
aria
= gwget
You're kidding? gwget does not have many features aria has.
manedit
= gmanedit
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org |
Le lundi 08 décembre 2008 à 16:27 +0100, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
aria
= gwget
You're kidding? gwget does not have many features aria has.
This is just a first guess based on the description.
If you want to still see these
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le lundi 08 décembre 2008 à 16:27 +0100, Rene Engelhard a écrit :
Josselin Mouette wrote:
Rene Engelhard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
aria
= gwget
You're kidding? gwget does not have many features aria has.
This is just a first guess based on the description.
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:35:46 +0100
Morten Kjeldgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am quite willing to adopt the package and maintain it, but I
couldn't find
it on the list of orphans. Maybe I didn't look hard enough? That list
is enormous... :-(
All the more reason to remove any package that
Neil Williams wrote:
snip
Barry - PLEASE do not continue with the request for sponsorship of
gtkglarea.
snip
Neil,
My apologies but I just uploaded it. It still has a few r(b)depends:
rdepends:
xt
worlded
vertex
python-visual
rbdepends:
celestia
vertex
xt
Sorry,
Barry deFreese
--
To
On Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:24:13 -0500
Barry deFreese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Neil Williams wrote:
snip
Barry - PLEASE do not continue with the request for sponsorship of
gtkglarea.
snip
Neil,
My apologies but I just uploaded it. It still has a few r(b)depends:
and will still
Hi,
Barry deFreese wrote:
Neil Williams wrote:
snip
Barry - PLEASE do not continue with the request for sponsorship of
gtkglarea.
snip
...
My apologies but I just uploaded it. It still has a few r(b)depends:
Well, post-lenny, all of them will be RC-buggy when GTK+ 1.2 is removed.
Neil Williams wrote:
snip
Has my response changed your opinion of gtkglarea in Debian? You could
always join the calls for packages depending on gtkglarea to migrate to
libgtkgl2.0 and thereby support the removal of gtk1.2 and glib1.
Not at all. In fact even for Lenny I attempted to do
Morten Kjeldgaard dijo [Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 01:50:44AM +0100]:
However, I maintain my objection. One thing is removing out-of-date
applications, another is to remove a library which may well be used
by users to compile and link their local applications. Even though
there are no apps in
On 08/12/2008, at 20.55, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
. Should we keep obsolete, deprecated,
abandoned software forever?
No, certainly not forever. Nobody has suggested keeping GTK+ 1.2
forever.
Hmmm... Sounds like an argument for porting Debian to the C64.
It's great if you can present your
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 21:49:09 +0100
Morten Kjeldgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the purposes of Debian and the FOSS community is to make it
possible to develop and distribute software that is authored and
supported by volunteers.
True.
We have a responsibility of supporting
Morten Kjeldgaard dijo [Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 02:35:46PM +0100]:
With its thousands of packages, Debian is not so rich in manpower, so if
the current maintainers of GTK+ 1.2 want to abandon it and the QA team is
not interested in keeping it, there is no other choice than to adopt it
(and
Morten Kjeldgaard dijo [Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 02:27:00PM +0100]:
For whom is the Debian distribution? Is it created to satisfy the
needs of only the packagers and developers? If so, it is absolutely
logical to get rid of everything a couple of years past expiry date.
To be clear, we are not
Morten Kjeldgaard dijo [Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 09:49:09PM +0100]:
. Should we keep obsolete, deprecated,
abandoned software forever?
No, certainly not forever. Nobody has suggested keeping GTK+ 1.2 forever.
But... There will always be a little tail of tools wanting it. We will
have to drop
Charles Plessy wrote:
[...]
Hi all,
seecurity is of course important, but as I was told during the last DPL
debate, it is possible to opt out support from the security team, which is
only for Stable anyway.
There's a testing security team in case you were not aware of it.
Cheers,
On Tue, Dec 09, 2008 at 08:48:34AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 04:25:56PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf a écrit :
All sorts of programming practices
that have become obsoleted (or outright shown to be dangerous) over
the years. As an example - Around ten years ago few people
Le Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 10:41:52PM +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard a écrit :
Please don't remove GTK+ 1.2. There are still upstream authors,
especially in science who use GTK+ 1.2 and who don't bother revising
their programs from the wisdom: if it ain't broke don't fix it.
Hi Morten,
With its
On Saturday 06 December 2008 23:15:06 Klaus Ethgen wrote:
Am Sa den 6. Dez 2008 um 21:38 schrieb Daniel Moerner:
xmms is gone:
It is still in stable and there are many installations. More than 7000
in popcon. And there is still no alternative.
IMHO audacious is a pretty decent alternative
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 01:50:44AM +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
On 06/12/2008, at 00.09, Michael Banck wrote:
There are several useful science programs that still make use of GTK+
1.2, one is a very useful chemistry program, GAMGI, which is in the
new
queue and on its way into
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Andreas Tille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libgtkimreg
paul
= Yay, an imaging library and an image viewer
As I said in a similar thread: These two packages should not block a
GTK 1.2 removal but as long as the library is there they might remain.
Just found
On 06/12/2008, at 10.01, Mike Hommey wrote:
With such arguments, we would still ship every single bit that was
shipped some day. This is going nowhere.
I don't recall advocating that every single bit that was shipped some
day should be kept around. You are twisting my words and distorting
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
snip
For whom is the Debian distribution? Is it created to satisfy the
needs of only the packagers and developers? If so, it is absolutely
logical to get rid of everything a couple of years past expiry date.
snip
So I am not advocating keeping every bit of software
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 09:20:31AM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
So I am not advocating keeping every bit of software around.
If we keep every version of every library out there how do we support
it?
Morten did not say that.
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Michael Banck wrote:
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 09:20:31AM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote:
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
So I am not advocating keeping every bit of software around.
If we keep every version of every library out there how do we support
it?
Morten did not say
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Devid Filoni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dillo
= there is a new upstream based on FLTK
I'm working on fltk2 package in order to update dillo to the new
upstream version that requires it.
Devid Antonio Filoni
--
To
Le vendredi 05 décembre 2008 à 21:43 -0600, Raphael Geissert a écrit :
Alain Schroeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gsnes9x
= visualboyadvance ?
C'mon, there are at least 15 years between the two consoles.
And nope, visualboyadvance doesn't replace gsnes9x, although the latter is
just
a
Le samedi 06 décembre 2008 à 14:27 +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard a écrit :
GTK+ 1.2 is not just any old library. It was the first truly open and
free graphics toolkit of excellent quality, an alternative to Motif
and the ugly Xaw widget sets, and was eagerly embraced by everyone.
This is a
On 06/12/2008, at 15.47, Barry deFreese wrote:
Obviously I was exaggerating purposely.
Yes, but, you know, exaggerating the position of others in a forum
like this is not really constructive. In fact, it signals that you've
run out of arguments.
I raised a -- I think -- valid concern
Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
On 06/12/2008, at 15.47, Barry deFreese wrote:
Obviously I was exaggerating purposely.
Yes, but, you know, exaggerating the position of others in a forum
like this is not really constructive. In fact, it signals that you've
run out of arguments.
Give me a
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And nope, visualboyadvance doesn't replace gsnes9x, although the latter is
just
a front-end.
Gah, I thought it was able to handle SNES ROMs. The correct answer would
probably be zsnes, although it only works on i386.
You missed the word frontend
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 04:25:17AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le vendredi 05 d?cembre 2008 ? 22:49 +, Mark Brown a ?crit :
It's nothing to do with power management. I'd rather let it stay until
lenny is released, though if it were the only thing keeping GTK 1.2 in
it should go.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You forgot xmms. It is still heavily used and there are no alternative
for it. (It is just such a application as xv - very old but there are no
alternative that completely replace it (in all facets).)
Regards
Klaus
- --
Klaus Ethgen
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Klaus Ethgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You forgot xmms. It is still heavily used and there are no alternative
for it. (It is just such a application as xv - very old but there are no
alternative that completely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Sa den 6. Dez 2008 um 21:38 schrieb Daniel Moerner:
xmms is gone:
It is still in stable and there are many installations. More than 7000
in popcon. And there is still no alternative.
Klaus
- --
Klaus Ethgen
On Fri, 05 Dec 2008 19:06:26 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
putty
= hotwire, a plain terminal…
According to http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/wishlist/
port-unix-gtk2.html, PuTTY trunk will build against GTK+ 2.0.
\o/
--
Sam Morris
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008 22:15:06 +0100
Klaus Ethgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Sa den 6. Dez 2008 um 21:38 schrieb Daniel Moerner:
xmms is gone:
It is still in stable and there are many installations. More than 7000
in popcon. And there is still no alternative.
Soon to be only in oldstable -
Hi,
GTK+ 1.2 has been deprecated upstream for 6 years. There is no security
support for it, and no new applications using it have been out for quite
a long time as well.
I think it is more than time to remove it from the archive. Of course,
this can only be done after we have dealt with the
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 07:06:26PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Jon Bernard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e16menuedit
= we don’t ship E16 anymore
packages.debian.org says otherwise.
--
James
GPG Key: 1024D/61326D40 2003-09-02 James Vega [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Josselin Mouette wrote:
snip
Debian Games Team [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lmemory
= gcompris ?
I'll take a look at this one.
snip
Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gnome-libs
gtkfontsel
gtkglarea
imlib
netdude
sqlrelay
stegdetect
= QA-maintained packages should be
Barry deFreese wrote:
OK, I have looked at several of these and man what a mess.
snip
Debian QA Group [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gnome-libs
Orphaned but obviously tons of r(b)depends.
gtkfontsel
Orphaned but a fairly significant popcon. I can't find new upstream
source. Could probably be
On Friday 05 December 2008 13:06, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Paul Mangan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sylpheed-gtk1 (U)
...
Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sylpheed-gtk1
= sylpheed-claws
sylpheed-gtk1 should be replaced by sylpheed. sylpheed-claws (now claws-mail)
is a fork.
Scott K
--
To
On 05/12/2008, at 21.11, Barry deFreese wrote:
Is this really feasible? How many people are going to work on dead
packages? Or if we RM: the lot of them, how many users are we
pissing off?
There are several useful science programs that still make use of GTK+
1.2, one is a very
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gtimer
= hamster-applet, gnotime
My intention is to request removal of gtimer when there's a consensus that
GTK+ 1.2 is going away. The package has been RFA for years without a
nibble, I haven't used it personally
Russ Allbery wrote:
Josselin Mouette [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gtimer
= hamster-applet, gnotime
My intention is to request removal of gtimer when there's a consensus that
GTK+ 1.2 is going away. The package has been RFA for years without a
nibble, I
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 07:06:26PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
powertweak
= Is that still relevant with modern power management policies?
It's nothing to do with power management. I'd rather let it stay until
lenny is released, though if it were the only
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 10:41:52PM +0100, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
On 05/12/2008, at 21.11, Barry deFreese wrote:
Is this really feasible? How many people are going to work on dead
packages? Or if we RM: the lot of them, how many users are we pissing
off?
There are several
On 06/12/2008, at 00.09, Michael Banck wrote:
There are several useful science programs that still make use of GTK+
1.2, one is a very useful chemistry program, GAMGI, which is in the
new
queue and on its way into unstable.
AFAICT, gamgi is using GTK-2.0.
Yes you are right, gamgi uses
Le vendredi 05 décembre 2008 à 13:19 -0500, James Vega a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 07:06:26PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Jon Bernard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e16menuedit
= we don’t ship E16 anymore
packages.debian.org says otherwise.
Ah right, it was renamed. Anyway, there is
Le vendredi 05 décembre 2008 à 15:11 -0500, Barry deFreese a écrit :
gtkfontsel
Orphaned but a fairly significant popcon. I can't find new upstream
source. Could probably be ported or RM:d.
The notion of X fonts is simply losing its meaning now that most if not
all toolkits are using
Le vendredi 05 décembre 2008 à 22:49 +, Mark Brown a écrit :
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 07:06:26PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Mark Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED]
powertweak
= Is that still relevant with modern power management policies?
It's nothing to do with power management. I'd
Barry deFreese wrote:
[...]
stegdetect
RM: filed.
Why isn't just the xsetg package dropped? stegdetect is a CLI app; only xsteg
uses GTK+
Cheers,
/me who has stegdetect installed and keeps it around to time by time try to find
something that just isn't there
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Raphael Geissert wrote:
Barry deFreese wrote:
[...]
stegdetect
RM: filed.
Why isn't just the xsetg package dropped? stegdetect is a CLI app; only xsteg
uses GTK+
Cheers,
/me who has stegdetect installed and keeps it around to time by time try to find
something that just
Josselin Mouette wrote:
[...]
Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
xbindkeys-config
= I think we have quite a number of key-event managers already
And is prone to buffer overflow attacks (only reported one atm, though).
Josip Rodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
gentoo
The maint docs will
85 matches
Mail list logo
