Re: Perl policy for managing modules ?

1998-10-12 Thread Roderick Schertler
On 11 Oct 1998 21:14:40 -0500, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > "Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Because most of the perl modules will work with all coming >> version of perl. > > I guess I am confused. How do we know this? How can we be > certain that

Re: Perl policy for managing modules ?

1998-10-12 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Raphael> Le Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 09:57:36AM -0400, Dan Jacobowitz écrivait: >> My question is, why are we so intent on removing the versioned >> component even though we have lost binary compatibility? I understand Raphael> Becau

Re: Perl policy for managing modules ?

1998-10-10 Thread Darren/Torin/Who Ever...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Zephaniah E. Hull, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote: >Rename perl to perl5.005, version 02-2 or such.. >Then use the alternatives setup to decide which perl gets run when you >try to use just 'perl'.. That's possible but I'm not sure it's a good idea

Re: Perl policy for managing modules ?

1998-10-09 Thread warp
Ok, after some thought, and fielding a LOT of perl questions on #debian, I've come up with a more workable idea which gives us much better handling for the next time something like this happens.. Rename perl to perl5.005, version 02-2 or such.. Then use the alternatives setup to decide which perl

Re: Perl policy for managing modules ?

1998-10-08 Thread Darren/Torin/Who Ever...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Raphael Hertzog, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote: >What about also adding /usr/lib/perl5(/$arch)? at the end of @INC ? >Is it possible ? >In that way, recent packages that are installed in /usr/lib/perl5/debian >are used first and only if no package

Re: Perl policy for managing modules ?

1998-10-08 Thread Darren/Torin/Who Ever...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Raphael Hertzog, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote: >Yes, but it's better leaving site_perl empty. It can be used for manually >(modules not in a .deb file) installing modules. Yes, I realize this. But most people using Perl manually install modules.

Re: Perl policy for managing modules ?

1998-10-08 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 09:57:36AM -0400, Dan Jacobowitz écrivait: > My question is, why are we so intent on removing the versioned > component even though we have lost binary compatibility? I understand Because most of the perl modules will work with all coming version of perl. Because Debian do

Re: Perl policy for managing modules ?

1998-10-08 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 02:31:40AM -0700, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... écrivait: > I do worry about what this might break as well. Another option would be > to have /usr/lib/perl5/debian(/$arch)? be the first element of @INC and > leave /usr/lib/perl5/$version(/$arch)? there with only the Perl > inst

Re: Perl policy for managing modules ?

1998-10-08 Thread Dan Jacobowitz
> Le Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 02:31:40AM -0700, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... écrivait: > > I do worry about what this might break as well. Another option would be > > to have /usr/lib/perl5/debian(/$arch)? be the first element of @INC and > > leave /usr/lib/perl5/$version(/$arch)? there with only the Per

Re: Perl policy for managing modules ?

1998-10-08 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 02:31:40AM -0700, Darren/Torin/Who Ever... écrivait: > I do worry about what this might break as well. Another option would be > to have /usr/lib/perl5/debian(/$arch)? be the first element of @INC and > leave /usr/lib/perl5/$version(/$arch)? there with only the Perl > inst

Re: Perl policy for managing modules ?

1998-10-08 Thread Darren/Torin/Who Ever...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Raphael Hertzog, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote: >Darren, if you agree, can you modify the perl package in order to >install modules in /usr/lib/perl5/debian and make these symlinks ? > >- /usr/lib/perl5/$arch/$version => /usr/lib/perl5/debian/$arch

Re: Perl policy for managing modules ?

1998-10-08 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Le Wed, Oct 07, 1998 at 04:16:09PM -0700, John Lapeyre écrivait: > Thats how I build my perl modules as well (and I guess others), so > it shouldn't be too much of a problem. (Acutally some of the more > complicated packages will need more changes.) Yes I've looked over source for packages t

Re: Perl policy for managing modules ?

1998-10-07 Thread John Lapeyre
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Raphael Hertzog wrote: rhertz>I propose to make package install the modules in /usr/lib/perl5/debian rhertz>and /usr/lib/perl5/debian/$arch. And the /usr/lib/perl5/$version would rhertz>be a link to "debian", and /usr/lib/perl5/$arch/$version a link to rhertz>"../debian/$arch"

Perl policy for managing modules ?

1998-10-07 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hello, I thought about the problem with directory used for installing perl modules. Actually if we do nothing, we would have to recompile all perl package for each perl5.00x release. That's because perl uses now /usr/lib/perl5/$version (and perl5/$arch/$version) as path to search for modules. And