Michael Casadevall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about simply decoupling mips/mipsel's version numbers so an out of
> date package on mips(el) doesn't stall out the rest of the
> testing. Having (somewhat) setup britney/update_out to generate testing
> for m68k, it should just be a matter of
00
> > From: Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: Please allow the migration of the packages stalled in the MIPS
> > buildd backlog.
> > Resent-Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 19:26:18 + (UTC)
> > Resent-From: debian-d
break everyone else.
Michael
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 18:57:03 +0100
From: Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Please allow the migration of the packages stalled in the MIPS
buildd backlog.
Resent-Date: S
On 02/03/08 at 23:34 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I have not asked MIPS to be removed from the list of released
> architectures. I have asked testing migration to be uncoupled from MIPS
> building while the buildds are suffering. In a previous thread it has
> been suggested that this operation re
Le Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 01:39:52PM +0200, Riku Voipio a écrit :
> If you want to positively influence the RM team to remove mips(el)
Dear all,
sorry for this extra email, but I do not want any misunderstanding.
I have not asked MIPS to be removed from the list of released
architectures. I have
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:34:23PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Thanks for the answer! Sometimes two letters are much clearer that
> longer sentences. I would have prefered that a good reason would be
> provided (do not tell me that you do not see an obvious difference
> between mips and mipsel w
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:02:09PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:56:19AM +0100, Julien BLACHE a écrit :
> > In the MIPS case, the buildds are impacted by real technical problems
> > that take time and effort to get fixed.
> Exactly, and real technical problems mean real
Le Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:09:06PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt a écrit :
> Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Would it be possible to allow the migration in testing of the package
> > that are waiting for being build on mips or mipsel until the buildd
> > problem is fixed?
>
> Same a
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would it be possible to allow the migration in testing of the package
> that are waiting for being build on mips or mipsel until the buildd
> problem is fixed?
Same answer as a few days ago: No.
Marc
--
Fachbegriffe der Informatik - Einfach erklärt
24
Le Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 10:56:19AM +0100, Julien BLACHE a écrit :
> In the MIPS case, the buildds are impacted by real technical problems
> that take time and effort to get fixed.
Exactly, and real technical problems mean real nuisance.
Dear Release managers,
as you probably noticed, the mips b
10 matches
Mail list logo
