"Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any chance you could also post the list of those with Build-Depends or
> Build-Depends-Indep on these packages?
Of course, sorry for forgetting this in the first place. Here's the
list. And again the question: Is there a script to mass-mail to al
Frank Küster wrote:
> We will probably have to remove files from teTeX due to license
> problems: Please check whether your package is affected!
[...]
> Below is a list of all
> packages that Depend on, Recommend, or Suggest either tetex-base,
> tetex-bin or tetex-extra, sorted by maintainer.
An
Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Summary:
>
> We will probably have to remove files from teTeX due to license
> problems: Please check whether your package is affected!
... and tell us.
> Note that we have tried to contact as many upstream authors as possible,
> and we will probably no
Summary:
We will probably have to remove files from teTeX due to license
problems: Please check whether your package is affected!
Hi,
in the past I have started to do a license auditing on teTeX. I found a
couple of files with non-free or unclear licensing, they are listed at
http://wiki.debi
4 matches
Mail list logo
