<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, no, that wouldn't be -- the -dev versions of packages are often in a
> different place. The point of my remark was that the Packages file said
> libpcap0 was in one place, and libpcap0's own control file said it was
> someplace else (net vs. libs). If this isn
On 8 Jun 1997, Guy Maor wrote:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The info in the new Packages file lists libpcap0 as being in net and
> > libpcap-dev as being in devel ...
>
> It's not a problem.
Well, no, that wouldn't be -- the -dev versions of packages are often in a
different place. The
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The info in the new Packages file lists libpcap0 as being in net and
> libpcap-dev as being in devel ...
It's not a problem.
> Also, the inclusion of libpcap-dev isn't mentioned in the ChangeLog, so I
> didn't fetch it. It was only after I looked in Packages.gz tha
On 7 Jun 1997, Guy Maor wrote:
> I made a 1.2.18 to fix this.
The info in the new Packages file lists libpcap0 as being in net and
libpcap-dev as being in devel, which is fine, but a dpkg --info on the
libpcap0 file itself reports its section as "libs", which doesn't exist in
rex. Is this a prob
I made a 1.2.18 to fix this.
Guy
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
On Thu, 5 Jun 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Before the coffin is nailed shut on rex, maybe the version of tcpdump that
> was placed in 1.2.17 should be replaced or backed out, as it depends on
> libpcap0, which is in bo, but not rex.
>
> I say this because I think Dale Scheetz (among other peop
Before the coffin is nailed shut on rex, maybe the version of tcpdump that
was placed in 1.2.17 should be replaced or backed out, as it depends on
libpcap0, which is in bo, but not rex.
I say this because I think Dale Scheetz (among other people) was going to
burn a CD of the final version of rex
7 matches
Mail list logo
