Processed: retitle 1056357 to general: on hppa, command line of any program invocation is limited to less than 3544 bytes

2023-11-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 1056357 general: on hppa, command line of any program invocation is > limited to less than 3544 bytes Bug #1056357 [general] general: on hppa, command line of any program invocation is Changed Bug title to 'general: on hppa, command line

Processed: retitle 929263 to /sbin and /usr/sbin are not in $PATH for unpriviledged users

2019-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 929263 /sbin and /usr/sbin are not in $PATH for unpriviledged users Bug #929263 [general] /sbin and /usr/sbin are not in /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games:/snap/bin:/sbin/:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:~/bin:~/Projects/

Processed: retitle 929263 to /sbin and /usr/sbin are not in /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games:/snap/bin:/sbin/:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:~/bin:~/Projects/bin:/usr/local/go/bin:/

2019-05-30 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 929263 /sbin and /usr/sbin are not in > /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games:/snap/bin:/sbin/:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:~/bin:~/Projects/bin:/usr/local/go/bin:/sbin/:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/sbin:/home/manu/bin:/home/manu/

Processed: retitle 820036 to Boot and installation support for Secure Boot systems

2019-04-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 820036 Boot and installation support for Secure Boot systems Bug #820036 [general] Debian does not run on systems with Secure Boot enabled Changed Bug title to 'Boot and installation support for Secure Boot systems' from 'Debian does not

Processed: retitle

2008-10-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 463643 buildd.d.o: no i386 and powerpc build daemons available which > can run 64bit binaries Bug#463643: no i386 and powerpc build daemons available which can run 64bit binaries Changed Bug title to `buildd.d.o: no i386 and powerpc build daem

Bug#105337: Processed: retitle

2008-08-27 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Vincent, On Wednesday 27 August 2008 22:35, Vincent Bernat wrote: > > Bug#105337: a central database for translated templates > > Changed Bug title to `i18n.debian.org: a central database for > > translated templates' from `a central database for translated > > templates'. > A

Re: Processed: retitle

2008-08-27 Thread Vincent Bernat
OoO En ce début de soirée du mercredi 27 août 2008, vers 21:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) disait : > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> retitle 105337 i18n.debian.org: a central database for translated templates > Bug#105337: a central database for translat

Processed: retitle

2008-08-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 105337 i18n.debian.org: a central database for translated templates Bug#105337: a central database for translated templates Changed Bug title to `i18n.debian.org: a central database for translated templates' from `a central database for transla

Processed: retitle 322762 to /usr/doc may still exist on upgrade of old systems

2007-05-14 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.4 > retitle 322762 /usr/doc may still exist on upgrade of old systems Bug#322762: /usr/doc still exists (transition tracking bug) Changed Bug title to /usr/doc may still exist on upgrade

Re: Bug#332739: Processed: retitle 332739 to debian packages are not safe to build on AFS, since find is typically used without -noleaf ...

2007-01-22 Thread Russ Allbery
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My two thoughts: > 1. Is this the only problem building Debian packages? I would have > thought the different model, including permissions, etc would mess up > the Debian package. Nope, fakeroot works fine. Everything pretty much works unless you need cro

Bug#332739: Processed: retitle 332739 to debian packages are not safe to build on AFS, since find is typically used without -noleaf ...

2007-01-22 Thread Brian May
> "Lars" == Lars Wirzenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Personally, I don't see that we need to support building Lars> Debian packages on systems (including file systems) that Lars> don't support Unix semantics. If we can fix building for Lars> AFS by merely changing find

Bug#332739: Processed: retitle 332739 to debian packages are not safe to build on AFS, since find is typically used without -noleaf ...

2007-01-22 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On ma, 2007-01-22 at 19:51 +1100, Brian May wrote: > 2. Is it possible to get find to autodetect the file system, and use > -noleaf only as required? Maybe get it to look for "." and ".." and if > it can't find them, automatically use -noleaf. Embedding filesystem > specific changes like this into

Bug#332739: Processed: retitle 332739 to debian packages are not safe to build on AFS, since find is typically used without -noleaf ...

2007-01-22 Thread Brian May
> "Debian" == Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Debian> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version >> 2.9.27 retitle 332739 debian packages are not safe to build on >> AFS, since find is typica

Processed: retitle 332739 to debian packages are not safe to build on AFS, since find is typically used without -noleaf ...

2007-01-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.27 > retitle 332739 debian packages are not safe to build on AFS, since find is > typically used without -noleaf Bug#332739: debhelper: dh_clean fails in certain filesystems Changed Bug t

Processed: retitle

2003-07-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 195481 Centralized configuration for location settings? Bug#195481: fragmented location info: hassle for users especially mobile ones Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug t

Processed: retitle

2003-07-29 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 179070 No PCMCIA modules for kernel-image-2.2.20 in woody Bug#179070: general: Troublesome pcmcia-modules placement Changed Bug title. > reassign 179070 pcmcia-cs Bug#179070: No PCMCIA modules for kernel-image-2.2.20 in woody Bug reassigned fro