Re: Proposed build profile: noinsttests

On Thu, 05 Sep 2019 at 07:19:30 +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > I agree that it can be confusing but I think it is just as confusing as any > other doubly negated boolean expression. It usually helps me to draw the truth > table when I'm unsure. Your example of is probably not > what you meant

Re: Proposed build profile: noinsttests

On Thu, 05 Sep 2019 at 06:30:34 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > «noinstcheck» would also map equally to autotools «make installcheck», > in the same way «nocheck» maps to «make check». To me, "check" would imply actively checking something - most likely by *running* the tests - rather than merely

Re: Proposed build profile: noinsttests

Hi Simon, Quoting Simon McVittie (2019-09-04 12:09:27) > I would like to propose this build profile for addition to > . I'll add it to the wiki if > there seems to be rough consensus. > > Name: noinsttests > Changes content of binary packages: No ("C: N"

Re: Proposed build profile: noinsttests

Hi! On Wed, 2019-09-04 at 23:16:39 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 11:09:27AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > The "noinsttests" name is inspired by previous discussion (on a bug > > asking for more in some package, if I remember correctly?), > > and by ginsttest-runner in

Re: Proposed build profile: noinsttests

On Wed, 04 Sep 2019 at 23:16:39 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: > On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 11:09:27AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > I think [combining tests with examples] should be allowed, and > > should not prevent use of the > > noinsttests profile. We shouldn't fill up the Packages file and the

Re: Proposed build profile: noinsttests

Hi Simon, On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 11:09:27AM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > Name: noinsttests > Changes content of binary packages: No ("C: N" on the wiki) > Changes set of binary packages: Yes ("S: Y" on the wiki) > Description: > Binary packages consisting entirely of automated tests, manual

Re: Proposed build profile: noinsttests

Simon McVittie writes: > The name of the profile > --- > > The "noinsttests" name is inspired by previous discussion (on a bug > asking for more in some package, if I remember correctly?), > and by ginsttest-runner in the gnome-desktop-testing package[1], which > is a

Re: Proposed build profile: noinsttests

Simon McVittie writes ("Proposed build profile: noinsttests"): > I would like to propose this build profile for addition to > <https://wiki.debian.org/BuildProfileSpec>. I'll add it to the wiki if > there seems to be rough consensus. > > Name: noinsttests >

Proposed build profile: noinsttests

I would like to propose this build profile for addition to . I'll add it to the wiki if there seems to be rough consensus. Name: noinsttests Changes content of binary packages: No ("C: N" on the wiki) Changes set of binary packages: Yes ("S: Y" on the