On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 02:50:22PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> I think you should start with a lower severity and consider bumping it
> to serious once you're down to a manageable number.
agreed. thanks for changing my mind, Julien!
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 03:11:21PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to propose a mass bug filing on source packages that miss
> support for build-arch or build-indep targets in debian/rules.
>
> Those targets were made mandatory in Debian Policy 3.9.4 (released in
> August
Hi!
On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 15:11:21 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I would like to propose a mass bug filing on source packages that miss
> support for build-arch or build-indep targets in debian/rules.
Thanks, that'd be great!
> There are currently 411 packages in testing that do not include
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 03:11:21PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I would like to propose a mass bug filing on source packages that miss
> support for build-arch or build-indep targets in debian/rules.
+1
> There are currently 411 packages in testing that do not include those
> targets,
Hi Lucas,
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 03:11:21PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Those targets were made mandatory in Debian Policy 3.9.4 (released in
> August 2012). From the changelog:
> * build-arch and build-indep are now mandatory targets in debian/rules,
> implementing the Technical
Hi,
I would like to propose a mass bug filing on source packages that miss
support for build-arch or build-indep targets in debian/rules.
Those targets were made mandatory in Debian Policy 3.9.4 (released in
August 2012). From the changelog:
* build-arch and build-indep are now mandatory
6 matches
Mail list logo
