Previously Adam P. Harris wrote:
> I think there's not really much way we can get them to get netscape to
> respect this; I don't think it's worth it to munge thru the (quite
> volatile) netscape preferences either.
We can use the automatic proxy configuration and point users at that.
We could h
[You (Adrian Bridgett)]
>We should also standardize the environment variables that are used. Once
>again, if the program doesn't support environment variables, tough -
>although of course maintainers are encouraged to "fix" the programs :-)
Maybe just enforce the standards that are kinda sorta al
On Thu, Dec 11, 1997 at 12:15:11PM -0500, Charles Briscoe-Smith wrote:
> Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 10 Dec 1997, Charles Briscoe-Smith wrote:
> >> ...and so on. I'm not sure that you can ever have a scheme that will work
> >> for -all- the wierd and wonderful proxies, caches
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 10 Dec 1997, Charles Briscoe-Smith wrote:
>> ...and so on. I'm not sure that you can ever have a scheme that will work
>> for -all- the wierd and wonderful proxies, caches and firewalls out there.
>>
>> (This cache is something that was knocked up lo
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 10 Dec 1997, Charles Briscoe-Smith wrote:
>> ...and so on. I'm not sure that you can ever have a scheme that will work
>> for -all- the wierd and wonderful proxies, caches and firewalls out there.
>>
>> (This cache is something that was knocked up lo
On 10 Dec 1997, Charles Briscoe-Smith wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >Well, http is pretty simple, it's either authenticated or unauthenticated
> >HTTP proxy protocol. There should be a way to specifiy for which hosts it
> >applies to..
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Well, http is pretty simple, it's either authenticated or unauthenticated
>HTTP proxy protocol. There should be a way to specifiy for which hosts it
>applies to.. You could also do HTTP over socks4/5 but that's a bit sill
On Mon, 8 Dec 1997, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> > > We should have a standard place for these things - say:
> > >
> > > /etc/proxies
> > >
> > > http="http://www.proxy.company.com:80";
> > > ftp="ftp://ftpproxy.firewall.com";
> > >
> > > How about making this policy. I realise that mo
On Sun, Dec 07, 1997 at 02:09:57PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> On Sun, 7 Dec 1997, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
>
> > This is one area where Windows has got a far better solution that Unix. I'm
> > sure it's for technical regions, but I have at least ten different areas in
> > which I set proxy s
On Sun, 7 Dec 1997, Adrian Bridgett wrote:
> This is one area where Windows has got a far better solution that Unix. I'm
> sure it's for technical regions, but I have at least ten different areas in
> which I set proxy servers and I'm fed up with it.
>
> We should have a standard place for thes
On Sat, Dec 06, 1997 at 02:26:26PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 6 Dec, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> >
> > Dirk> wget works for me behind a firewall at work. All it needs are the
> > Dirk> http_proxy and ftp_proxy environment variables pointing the correct
> > Dirk> proxy server.
> >
11 matches
Mail list logo
