Re: Qt2.2 released under the GPL

2000-09-05 Thread Joseph Carter
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 08:08:33PM +0200, happ wrote: > enough said > > http://www.trolltech.com > > now we can move the ftp://kde.tdyc.com/pub/kde potato kde2 contrib > back home > > WE WON ! No, we didn't win. Neither did KDE. Troll Tech won this license war. It looks like the rest of us w

Re: Qt2.2 released under the GPL

2000-09-05 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 06:32:10PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > No, it was just an observation of a coincidence that my twisted mind > found amusing. :) Yes, I suppose it was amusing :) > Away put your flamethrowers! I mean you no harm! I didnt have it out :) -- M

Re: Qt2.2 released under the GPL

2000-09-05 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 06:32:10PM -0400, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Away put your flamethrowers! I mean you no harm! Not that there were any flamethrowers coming out, but this line was too good to pass up. (I think my brain has been addled from too much Nethac

Re: Qt2.2 released under the GPL

2000-09-05 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 10:26:30AM +1200, Michael Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 06:02:01PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > > Does anyone else find it ironic that licq-plugin-gtk+ was finally > > installed > > into the archive today? Guess it wouldn't be

Re: Qt2.2 released under the GPL

2000-09-05 Thread Michael Beattie
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 06:02:01PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > Does anyone else find it ironic that licq-plugin-gtk+ was finally installed > into the archive today? Guess it wouldn't be Debian if it was on time ;-) IIRC, I added the override entry for that within 24 hours of it arriving :P

Re: Qt2.2 released under the GPL

2000-09-05 Thread David Starner
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 06:02:01PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote: > Does anyone else find it ironic that licq-plugin-gtk+ was finally installed > into the archive today? Guess it wouldn't be Debian if it was on time ;-) But licq is free, whether Qt is GPL or QPL. Personally, I switched over to th

Re: Qt2.2 released under the GPL

2000-09-05 Thread Daniel Burrows
Does anyone else find it ironic that licq-plugin-gtk+ was finally installed into the archive today? Guess it wouldn't be Debian if it was on time ;-) Daniel -- /- Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -\ |f u cn rd ths, | Put no trust in cryp

Re: Qt2.2 released under the GPL

2000-09-04 Thread Jeff Teunissen
Bas Zoetekouw wrote: > > Thus spake happ ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > enough said > > http://www.trolltech.com > > now we can move the ftp://kde.tdyc.com/pub/kde potato kde2 contrib > > back home > > Great! Has anyone yet packages available? If not, I'll be willing to ITP > some. Qt 2.2 hasn't be

Re: Qt2.2 released under the GPL

2000-09-04 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Thus spake happ ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > enough said > http://www.trolltech.com > now we can move the ftp://kde.tdyc.com/pub/kde potato kde2 contrib > back home Great! Has anyone yet packages available? If not, I'll be willing to ITP some. -- Kind regards, +---

Re: Qt2.2 released under the GPL

2000-09-04 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 08:08:33PM +0200, happ wrote: > > enough said > > http://www.trolltech.com > > now we can move the ftp://kde.tdyc.com/pub/kde potato kde2 contrib > back home The sources have to be recompiled at least with the new Qt. > WE WON ! Everyone won :) Thanks, Marcus -- `R

Qt2.2 released under the GPL

2000-09-04 Thread happ
enough said http://www.trolltech.com now we can move the ftp://kde.tdyc.com/pub/kde potato kde2 contrib back home WE WON ! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]