On Mon, 17 Jun 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> With that license it would definitely go in non-free. Each CD manufacturer
> would have to ask permission individually to put it on their CD.
Dale, why don't you send them some mail asking if this would be the
case? If so - nonfree, if not - main.
I th
> "DM" == Dale Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DM> Secondly, the LClint package provides some .el and .elc files
DM> to allow access to LClint through emacs. I noticed a directory
DM> under /usr/lib/emacs named site-lisp. Is this an appropriate
DM> place to install these files or does that d
> So is this allowed in the regular distribution or should it
> be in non-free.
Seems ok to me, if not ok tell me because same kind of thing is with the
mathpad package.
> Secondly, the LClint package provides some .el and .elc files
> to allow access to LClint through emacs. I noticed a direc
Dale Miller writes:
> > I am writing to request permission to modify and re-distribute
> > lclint as part of the Debian projects distribution of Linux.
>
> Sure, I have no problem with this, as long as some effort is made to
> make sure the most recent version is included as well as documentation
With that license it would definitely go in non-free. Each CD manufacturer
would have to ask permission individually to put it on their CD.
Thanks
Bruce
I am working on an LClint package that is taking much
longer than I expected due to unforseen time constraints.
I hope to finish it up in the next couple of weeks. To
do so I need answers to a couple of questions. First and
most important is a question about the license. It follows:
Copyright
6 matches
Mail list logo