nice work!
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:27:59PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:25:17PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Debian and Democracy
>> > Posted 7 Oct 2003 by exa (Master)
>>
>>
>> Ha.
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 06:27:59PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:25:17PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
>
> >
> > Debian and Democracy
> > Posted 7 Oct 2003 by exa (Master)
>
>
> Ha. Hahahaa. Ha, ha, ha...
You don't think he's a Mast
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 04:25:17PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
>
> Debian and Democracy
> Posted 7 Oct 2003 by exa (Master)
Ha. Hahahaa. Ha, ha, ha...
--
- mdz
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 09:37:39AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Whether there were other potential "5th sponsors" that were dissuaded,
> I couldn't say.
I considered it, as the first indications I recieved (from going through
mailing list archives) was that he was no more abrasive than others on
Am Do, den 09.10.2003 schrieb Branden Robinson um 05:17:
> http://people.debian.org/~rene/exa-log-24-07-2003
Just wanted to thank rene for recording that, it was a interesting
reading for the evening, and certainly better than German TV. I
especially like these parts:
15:39 * Madkiss grins
15:39
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:06:46AM -0500, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
> I will admit I was one of the four sponsors, based on my theory that
> the best way to make someone be nice, is to be nice to them, as what
> goes around comes around. Golden rule and all that.
>
> In retrospect, perhaps that tech
(in the interest of openness...)
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 08:06:46AM -0500, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
> Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think this should be clearly discussed.
> > Original link at:
> > http://www.advogato.org/article/716.html
> >
> > Debian and Democracy
> > Posted 7
Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this should be clearly discussed.
> Original link at:
> http://www.advogato.org/article/716.html
>
>
> Debian and Democracy
> Posted 7 Oct 2003 by exa (Master)
>
> me "you need to get 5 sponsors blah blah" I found 4, but they scared out
> every 5
* Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-08 16:25]:
> I personally sent and email to DAM asking if I should ask again for
> sponsor or if should I wait to become a developer and I got no
> answer.
Actually, you did get an answer, on day after sending your mail.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTE
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:42:42PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > I think this should be clearly discussed.
>
> Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that
> the rant you quoted was authored by Eray Ozkural.
Thanks, you saved me from re
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 04:01:47AM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:42:42PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> | Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that
> | the rant you quoted was authored by Eray Ozkural.
>
> Hmm. I've heard that name mentioned before on this m
Well... After a little bit more research I found a good email about this
in debian mentors.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2003/debian-mentors-200307/msg00252.html
Maybe this thread is not needed anymore. Sorry.
[]'s
daniel
Em Qua, 2003-10-08 às 16:25, Daniel Ruoso escreveu:
> I think
Thomas Hood, 2003-10-08 22:00:17 +0200 :
> On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
>> I think this should be clearly discussed.
>
> Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that
> the rant you quoted was authored by Eray Ozkural.
I'll add that since I posted [1], [2] and [3], I
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 04:01:47 +0800
Cameron Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:42:42PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> | On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> | > I think this should be clearly discussed.
> |
> | Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point ou
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 10:13:53PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> And if you want to discusse anyway then please do it on
> debian-projects og maybe rather debian-couriosa where it belongs. I
> has nothing to do with developing Debian (the distribution).
Why even waste debian bandwidth on it? Adv
On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 04:01:47 +0800, Cameron Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:42:42PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
>> On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
>> > I think this should be clearly discussed.
>>
>> Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out th
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
>> I think this should be clearly discussed.
> Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that
> the rant you quoted was authored by Eray Ozkural.
And to immediately stop the any discussion:
-
He wanted to take over some of my packages and sent an email to
debian-kde, but not to my Debian address. By the time I had learned of
what he was doing, he had already created his own packages. He didn't
know how to work with other people.
If he was a developer, then he probably would have hijack
On Thu, 09 Oct 2003, Cameron Patrick wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:42:42PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
> | On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> | > I think this should be clearly discussed.
> |
> | Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that
> | the rant you quoted was
Daniel Ruoso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think this should be clearly discussed.
He calls named people village idiots and morons and acuses peoples of
'poor rhetoric'. I don't think that kind of stuff deserves to be
discussed anywhere.
And if you want to discusse anyway then please do it on
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 09:42:42PM +0200, Thomas Hood wrote:
| On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
| > I think this should be clearly discussed.
|
| Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that
| the rant you quoted was authored by Eray Ozkural.
Hmm. I've heard that name m
On Wed, 2003-10-08 at 21:25, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> I think this should be clearly discussed.
Just to prevent any confusion I'll just point out that
the rant you quoted was authored by Eray Ozkural.
--
Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think this should be clearly discussed.
Original link at:
http://www.advogato.org/article/716.html
Debian and Democracy
Posted 7 Oct 2003 by exa (Master)
Two unrelated words. From experience.
Now, what is the problem with debian? It's because debian claims to be
democratic, but it isn't. It
24 matches
Mail list logo
