Re: RBL report..

2000-03-26 Thread Jason Henry Parker
Steve Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This is misleading. What ORBS does is *test* mail servers to ensure that it *is* an open relay, before adding the relay's address to the list. They do NOT (according to the web page) scan the net for open relays. Rather, the list is generated

Re: RBL report..

2000-03-26 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:00:54PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote: I don't see how you can create a false positive on a relay test. Either the message gets through, and you're an open relay, or it doesn't, and you're fine. It's quite simple, really. Actually, I ran the relay test at abuse.net on two

Re: RBL report..

2000-03-26 Thread Jason Henry Parker
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 04:00:54PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote: I don't see how you can create a false positive on a relay test. Either the message gets through, and you're an open relay, or it doesn't, and you're fine. It's quite simple, really.

Re: RBL report..

2000-03-26 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, Mar 26, 2000 at 05:10:06PM +0200, Nils Jeppe wrote: On Sun, 26 Mar 2000, Joseph Carter wrote: DUL and ORBS both seem to think they need to punish anyone whose config or origin does not meet their standards (or as someone else noted in the case of ORBS, if they are unable to test

<    1   2