Yeah, it was specifically left out of xcontrib, because the procps one
was a lot better: from dpkg --status,
> xfontsel, xgc, xman, and xmessage. (xload is in xproc now.)
Did the procps upstream give any *reason* they don't include xload
anymore? Could the current procps maintainer keep it in as
I think we have to report this against the appropriate X package now
since procps source does no longer contain xload. Quite some time ago we
decided to go with procps' xload simply because it was better than the X
one. Now it seems we have to revert that decision.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, P
2 matches
Mail list logo
