Mark Baker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 11:56:02AM +0100, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
That will be a problem with lyx as the upstream side is
thinking about a switch anyway, but qt is the leading candidate
there.
Someone should tell them about GTK, now that
On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 11:56:02AM +0100, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
That will be a problem with lyx as the upstream side is thinking about a
switch anyway, but qt is the leading candidate there.
Someone should tell them about GTK, now that version 1.0 has been released.
A little bit of info
Shaleh writes:
The author has stated that this is no longer a goal of his library.
Also, many of the XForms apps that we use would require modifications
because the author of fltk did not re-create anything that took an X
type as an argument (like XEvent). It is possible to make the XForm
On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 09:48:42AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
Shaleh writes:
The author has stated that this is no longer a goal of his library.
Also, many of the XForms apps that we use would require modifications
because the author of fltk did not re-create anything that took an X
On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 09:48:42AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
That will be a problem with lyx as the upstream side is thinking about a
switch anyway, but qt is the leading candidate there.
I got the impression that KLyX is a forked version, and that the LyX
maintianers are trying to make
/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 1998 12:57 PM
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: fltk and XForms compliance
On Fri, Apr 17, 1998
On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 12:57:00PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 09:48:42AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
That will be a problem with lyx as the upstream side is thinking about a
switch anyway, but qt is the leading candidate there.
I got the impression that KLyX
7 matches
Mail list logo
