Re: RFC: Standardizing a new Protected field

2020-03-29 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Mon, 2020-03-09 at 10:23:36 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Summary > --- > > The goal of the following proposal is to standardize a field to split > part of the Essential packages, and add support for it in the package > management stack. There is currently an Important field, that has

Re: RFC: Standardizing a new Protected field

2020-03-10 Thread Josh Triplett
Guillem Jover wrote: > Summary > --- > > The goal of the following proposal is to standardize a field to split > part of the Essential packages, and add support for it in the package > management stack. There is currently an Important field, that has the > correct semantics but has a very conf

RFC: Standardizing a new Protected field

2020-03-09 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! Summary --- The goal of the following proposal is to standardize a field to split part of the Essential packages, and add support for it in the package management stack. There is currently an Important field, that has the correct semantics but has a very confusing name and is only support