Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Brian May wrote:
>
> > This proposal would also allow, say bochs, to provide i386 too (although
> > I think more work might be needed here).
>
> No, it wouldn't.
>
> Say you install bochs on alpha. If bochs provides i386, then this
Andreas Rottmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Russell" == Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Russell> On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 16:35, Geert Stappers wrote:
> >> When the cause of the buildproblem is in the package, fix the
> >> problem there. The package maintainer hasn'
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 04:30:01PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> This proposal would also allow, say bochs, to provide i386 too (although
> I think more work might be needed here).
This would be stretching it, but if bochs can run them transparently, maybe.
In particular, you would need a good scoring
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 11:14:58AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> Say you install bochs on alpha. If bochs provides i386, then this would tell
> dpkg that it is ok to install i386 binaries in the host.
As I said, more work is needed here, for instance to ensure that
bochs can trasparently run i386 bi
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Brian May wrote:
> This proposal would also allow, say bochs, to provide i386 too (although
> I think more work might be needed here).
No, it wouldn't.
Say you install bochs on alpha. If bochs provides i386, then this would tell
dpkg that it is ok to install i386 binaries i
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 09:59:44PM +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> This looks like much more comprehensive and consistent solution than
> what I have come up with. Any plans to make this real?
Numerous good ideas along similar lines have been proposed over the
past X years (where X is such a larg
> "Roland" == Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Roland> Andreas Rottmann wrote:
>> I think in the light of upcoming *BSD ports, the HURD port and
>> the (hopefully not too distant ;-)) possibility of getting the
>> HURD ported to other CPU families, we really need
Andreas Rottmann wrote:
> I think in the light of upcoming *BSD ports, the HURD port and the
> (hopefully not too distant ;-)) possibility of getting the HURD ported
> to other CPU families, we really need improvement here.
http://master.debian.org/~brinkmd/arch-handling.txt
--
Roland Bauerschmi
> "Russell" == Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Russell> On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 16:35, Geert Stappers wrote:
>> When the cause of the buildproblem is in the package, fix the
>> problem there. The package maintainer hasn't to do it by
>> himself, he can/must/should coopera
9 matches
Mail list logo
