On 17-May-08, 11:51 (CDT), Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using Replaces on its own seems bizarre to me. OTOH, some packages do
> this; e.g., xfce4 Replaces xfce4-dev without conflicting with it. [0]
It's not bizarre. That's how you move files from one package to another.
It woul
On Sat, 17 May 08 20:40, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 17:57, Armin
> Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> > Replaces must not come with Conflicts.
> > Consider a package foo which contains a lot of architecture independent
> > files. One day
OoO Lors de la soirée naissante du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 17:57, Armin
Berres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> Replaces must not come with Conflicts.
> Consider a package foo which contains a lot of architecture independent
> files. One day you decide to split the arch independent files into a new
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 03:48:03PM +0200, Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> 0==0
> Info for debian-devel: we try to figure out how to package figtoipe.
> Before version 6.0pre30-1, a version of figtoipe was
On 17-May-08, 04:30 (CDT), Vincent Bernat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [This message is about using Replaces without Conflicts]
>
> I am not sure either. As you noted, the policy does not say to not use
> it alone, but this just seems odd to me. Let's hope that someone else
> will enlighten
On Sat, 17 May 08 11:30, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 11:17,
> Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> >> When using Conflicts and having files in common with the other package,
> >> you need Replaces as well. Otherwise, durin
OoO Vers la fin de l'après-midi du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 16:02,
Vincent Fourmond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> Vincent Bernat wrote:
>> The valid way to replace a file without conflicting with a package is to
>> use diversion. This is not a solution in your case because you would
>> h
Hello,
Vincent Bernat wrote:
> The valid way to replace a file without conflicting with a package is to
> use diversion. This is not a solution in your case because you would
> have to ask maintainer of ipe to use diversion too and since figtoipe is
> no longer shipped with ipe, he won't be
Hi,
0==0
Info for debian-devel: we try to figure out how to package figtoipe.
Before version 6.0pre30-1, a version of figtoipe was included in the ipe
package. Since then, figtoipe is a separate upstream package and also
gone from
OoO En cette fin de matinée radieuse du samedi 17 mai 2008, vers 11:17,
Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>> When using Conflicts and having files in common with the other package,
>> you need Replaces as well. Otherwise, during upgrade, the user may see
>> error messages about you
10 matches
Mail list logo
