On Apr 13, 2011, at 10:00 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>I think it makes more sense to have a release or two where users can
>fall back on python2. Well there needs to be at least one
>where /usr/bin/python becomes python3 alerting users to the change and
>giving them the python2 fallback, just so
Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Michael Gilbert, 2011-04-13]
> > Can't that be solved in the release notes when that happens? Something
> > like:
> >
> > python3 is now the default /usr/bin/python, so if you have existing
> > python2 scripts you will need to make sure to use /usr/bin/python2
>
[Michael Gilbert, 2011-04-13]
> Can't that be solved in the release notes when that happens? Something
> like:
>
> python3 is now the default /usr/bin/python, so if you have existing
> python2 scripts you will need to make sure to use /usr/bin/python2
> instead (or convert them to pyt
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 09:22:44 AM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > On Apr 11, 2011, at 07:22 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > >Hopefully it will gain additional sanity before approval (the authors did
> > >improve it based on comments I sent them it could still be better). The
On Wednesday, April 13, 2011 09:22:44 AM Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Apr 11, 2011, at 07:22 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >Hopefully it will gain additional sanity before approval (the authors did
> >improve it based on comments I sent them it could still be better). The
> >notion that /usr/bin/python
On Apr 11, 2011, at 07:22 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>Hopefully it will gain additional sanity before approval (the authors did
>improve it based on comments I sent them it could still be better). The
>notion that /usr/bin/python pointing to any python3 version in the near term
>is anything other
[Adrian von Bidder, 2011-04-13]
> Agreed. However, it would be interesting to track which of the bg/major
> python packages/frameworks are not available on Python3 yet, if only as a
> reference for the next time somebody proposes to have /usr/bin/python be a
> Python 3.
>
> http://wiki.debian.o
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 08:46, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> Agreed. However, it would be interesting to track which of the bg/major
> python packages/frameworks are not available on Python3 yet, if only as a
> reference for the next time somebody proposes to have /usr/bin/python be a
> Python 3.
>
>
Hi,
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 01.22:55 Scott Kitterman wrote:
> The notion that /usr/bin/python pointing to any python3 version in the
> near term is anything other than crazy talk is, well, crazy.
Agreed. However, it would be interesting to track which of the bg/major
python packages/frameworks
Barry Warsaw wrote:
>On Apr 09, 2011, at 01:38 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>>We've treated python and python3 as separate runtime environments. We
>also
>>have a default python3 (just in the middle of transitioning to 3.2).
>The
>>only meaningful change that would make python3 the 'default pyt
On Apr 09, 2011, at 01:38 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>We've treated python and python3 as separate runtime environments. We also
>have a default python3 (just in the middle of transitioning to 3.2). The
>only meaningful change that would make python3 the 'default python' is if we
>pointed /usr/b
On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:49:17 -0400, Scott Kitterman
wrote:
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 01:26:12 PM Andreas Barth wrote:
* Scott Kitterman (deb...@kitterman.com) [110409 19:07]:
> Obviously that was a Squeeze goal. The equivalent goal for Wheezy
should
> be python2.7 as default and python
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 01:26:12 PM Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Scott Kitterman (deb...@kitterman.com) [110409 19:07]:
> > Obviously that was a Squeeze goal. The equivalent goal for Wheezy should
> > be python2.7 as default and python2.5 and python2.6 removed.
>
> Sure. Please feel free to fix t
On Saturday, April 09, 2011 01:33:01 PM Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I noticed that this is still listed at
> > http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals.
> >
> > Obviously that was a Squeeze goal. The equivalent goal for Wheezy should
> > be python2.7 as default and python2.5 an
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I noticed that this is still listed at http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals.
>
> Obviously that was a Squeeze goal. The equivalent goal for Wheezy should be
> python2.7 as default and python2.5 and python2.6 removed.
Is it out of the question to target python3.x as the
* Scott Kitterman (deb...@kitterman.com) [110409 19:07]:
> Obviously that was a Squeeze goal. The equivalent goal for Wheezy should be
> python2.7 as default and python2.5 and python2.6 removed.
Sure. Please feel free to fix that.
Andi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.
16 matches
Mail list logo